Illumination benefits using LED high brightness bulb compare to traditional illumination systems

Macias, Hugo Andres; Ulianov, Y.; Ramos, Yesid

doi:10.1109/sifae.2012.6478898

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This LED technology has increasingly been used in many electric devices, and one of their great advantages over other light sources is the low battery consumption (Macias et al 2012). Light-emitting diodes have been implemented in various traps to produce a more efficient lighting system that reduces power consumption by 50-60% (Cohnstaedt et al 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Field Evaluation of Different Traps for Collecting Adult Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an Endemic Area of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Quintana Roo, Mexico

Rodríguez‐Rojas

Arque-Chunga

Fernández‐Salas

et al. 2016

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phlebotominae are the vectors of Leishmania parasites. It is important to have available surveillance and collection methods for the sand fly vectors. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare traps for the collection of sand fly species and to analyze trap catches along months and transects. Field evaluations over a year were conducted in an endemic area of leishmaniasis in the state of Quintana Roo, Mexico. A randomized-block design was implemented in study area with tropical rainforest vegetation. The study design utilized 4 transects with 11 trap types: 1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap with incandescent bulb (CDC-I), 2) CDC light trap with blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (CDC-B), 3) CDC light trap with white LEDs (CDC-W), 4) CDC light trap with red LEDs (CDC-R), 5) CDC light trap with green LEDs (CDC-G), 6) Disney trap, 7) Disney trap with white LEDs, 8) sticky panels, 9) sticky panels with white LEDs, 10) delta-like trap, and 11) delta-like trap with white LEDs. A total of 1,014 specimens of 13 species and 2 genera (Lutzomyia and Brumptomyia) were collected. There were significant differences in the mean number of sand flies caught with the 11 traps; CDC-I was (P = 0.0000) more effective than the other traps. Other traps exhibited the following results: CDC-W (17.46%), CDC-B (15.68%), CDC-G (14.89%), and CDC-R (14.30%). The relative abundance of different species varied according to trap types used, and the CDC-I trap attracted more specimens of the known vectors of Leishmania spp., such as like Lutzomyia cruciata, Lu. shannoni, and Lu. ovallesi. Disney trap captured more specimens of Lu. olmeca olmeca. Based on abundance and number of species, CDC light traps and Disney traps appeared to be good candidates for use in vector surveillance programs in this endemic area of Mexico.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Field Evaluation of Different Traps for Collecting Adult Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an Endemic Area of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Quintana Roo, Mexico

Rodríguez‐Rojas

Arque-Chunga

Fernández‐Salas

et al. 2016

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Por otro lado, el ángulo de emisión de luz es menor a 180 grados, toda la luz generada está enfocada hacia la parte frontal del LED. [12].…”

Section: Diodo Emisor De Luz (Led)unclassified

Sistemas De Iluminación, Situación Actual Y Perspectivas

Saavedra

Rey

Luyo

2017

TECNIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMENEl incremento de los precios de la energía eléctrica, las preocupaciones sobre el cambio climático, la independencia y seguridad energética impulsan el cambio del mercado mundial de la iluminación hacia fuentes de luz energéticamente más eficientes. La iluminación, según estimaciones de la International Energy Agency (IEA), representa casi el 20% del consumo mundial de energía eléctrica. En el Perú, según el Ministerio de Energía y Minas, aproximadamente el 35% de la energía primaria (después de la transformación y/o descontadas las pérdidas) es destinada a la generación eléctrica, la cual presenta consumos importantes en iluminación: Sector Residencial 15% a 30%, sector Comercial aprox. 33%, sector Público aprox. 24% y sector industrial 10% a 15%. Dados estos niveles importantes de consumo en sistemas de iluminación, el uso transversal en todos los sectores, la falta de un marco político regulatorio integral, así como la necesidad de determinar y establecer alternativas de eficiencia energética, es necesario el conocimiento de la situación actual y las perspectivas de los sistemas de iluminación. Para lograr el ahorro de energía en iluminación, la IEA recomienda a los gobiernos: Eliminación progresiva de productos de iluminación ineficientes; adoptar iluminación de calidad, fiabilidad y Estándares Mínimos de Eficiencia Energética (MEPS); apoyar el desarrollo, uso y actualización de las normas internacionales de pruebas y los protocolos de medición para reducir los costos de cumplimiento de la industria y apoyar los requerimientos de política nacional; exigir y promover un mejor diseño y gestión de sistemas de iluminación al asegurar que los códigos de construcción promuevan el uso de la luz natural e incluyan MEPS para sistemas de iluminación, incluya información y formación dirigidas a arquitectos, constructores, propietarios y gestores. Actualmente el mercado está dominado por las tecnologías de iluminación convencionales, las cuales están siendo desplazadas por la tecnología de Iluminación de Estado Sólido (SSL). A nivel mundial, la SSL que comprende LED, OLED y la gestión de los sistemas de iluminación, marcan la tendencia con grandes probabilidades de lograr los objetivos de ahorro y eficiencia energética. La SSL ofrece controlabilidad mejorada, nuevos factores de forma (que facilitan el reemplazo de tecnologías convencionales) y nuevas funcionalidades (base de la industria de la iluminación inteligente) que se pueden integrar con sistemas de sensores y de control, lo que permite mayor ahorro de energía. No obstante, la existencia de tecnologías de mayor eficiencia y características lumínicas, existen barreras para su adopción, principalmente: falta de información y sensibilidad, falta de confianza, mayor costo inicial, incentivos inadecuados, temores percibidos relacionados a la salud y el ambiente. Así mismo, hay una serie de barreras para la adopción de productos SSL, estos comprenden principalmente costos iniciales, confiabilidad, estabilidad de color y compatibilidad; que pueden limitar la adop...

show abstract

“…The establishment of LEDs instead of traditional artificial lighting systems results in energy saving. For instance, while comparing LEDs with traditional lighting systems, Macias et al [12] reported that there was a great energy saving, between 41% and 73% of power consumption, compared with the technology of that period such as HPS lamps. Similarly, Serrano-Tierz [13] concluded that the replacement of metal halide lights by LEDs luminaries resulted in a high energy saving and an increase of the life span of the luminaires.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparisons of Different Lighting Systems for Horticultural Seedling Production Aimed at Energy Saving

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, the evaluation of sustainability is an important aspect in the study of agricultural systems and the number of projects and methods for impact assessment of food production systems is increasing. In this work, we initially carried out a survey to know the status of the artificial lighting establishment in horticultural seedling nurseries in southern Spain. Taking into account the data obtained in the survey, we conducted an experiment with different types of fluorescent lamps (TLD-18, CF, TL5, TLD-56), light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and their combinations along with the novelty white LEDs lamps and XTRASUN LEDs to evaluate their technical parameters and spectral light qualities. In addition, the effectiveness of light irradiance (ELIplant) and the use of irradiance (UI) by cucumber and tomato seedling plants were estimated considering their light absorbance capacity previously analyzed. The results showed that TLD-18 lamps and their combinations, CF and XTRASUN LEDs, had a limited value of energy efficiency (VEEI) ≤ 2. The lamps essayed with the lowest total irradiance were LEDs (B, R, V, W) and the ones with the highest values were TLD58-6 lamps. The effectiveness of light irradiance (ELIplant) and the UI were slightly higher in the case of cucumber than that of the tomato for all essayed lamps. Considering the effectiveness of the light irradiance (ELIplant), TL5-6 lamps showed the highest values. On the other hand, considering the use of irradiance, XTRASUN LEDs on the mode of vegetative growth (VG) showed the highest values.

show abstract

Illumination benefits using LED high brightness bulb compare to traditional illumination systems

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

Comparative Field Evaluation of Different Traps for Collecting Adult Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an Endemic Area of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Quintana Roo, Mexico

Comparative Field Evaluation of Different Traps for Collecting Adult Phlebotomine Sand Flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an Endemic Area of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Quintana Roo, Mexico

Sistemas De Iluminación, Situación Actual Y Perspectivas

Comparisons of Different Lighting Systems for Horticultural Seedling Production Aimed at Energy Saving

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About