2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma: comparison with surgical excision biopsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chatani et al compared the diagnostic complications in CNB vs SEB; the grade 3 complication rate was significantly lower (0% vs. 4.6%, P < .01), thus suggesting that severe complications are extremely rare with CNB procedures. Chatani et al also found there was no significant statistical difference in overall complication rates (4.9% vs. 6.5%, respectively, P = .61) 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chatani et al compared the diagnostic complications in CNB vs SEB; the grade 3 complication rate was significantly lower (0% vs. 4.6%, P < .01), thus suggesting that severe complications are extremely rare with CNB procedures. Chatani et al also found there was no significant statistical difference in overall complication rates (4.9% vs. 6.5%, respectively, P = .61) 20 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Chatani et al also found there was no significant statistical difference in overall complication rates (4.9% vs. 6.5%, respectively, P = .61). 20 Another important limitation is that adequate provision of image-guided CNB services is reliant upon fully trained operators in both diagnostic ultrasonography and CNB technique. However, once trained it is less operator-dependent than FNA.…”
Section: Limitations Of Cnbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in biopsy for bone tumors, percutaneous biopsy for soft tissue tumors is also performed mainly under CT or US guidance under local anesthesia [7][8][9][10][11]. Biopsy is generally performed under US guidance for tumors in a superficial area and under CT guidance for tumors in a deep area [7,13]. However, the modality should be determined by considering the The diagnostic yield of core-needle biopsy for soft tissue tumors, including lymphatic lesions, has been reported to be 76%-97% [7-10, 29, 45].…”
Section: Soft Tissue Tumor Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, surgical biopsy for soft tissue tumors located in deep areas, such as the retroperitoneal or mediastinal regions, is invasive and places a substantial burden on the patient. Percutaneous needle biopsy is superior to surgical biopsy in terms of reduced invasiveness and earlier results from histopathological diagnosis; therefore, core-needle biopsy should be considered as the first choice for patients who require early diagnosis or with low performance status [7]. Several studies reported that no significant difference was found between diagnostic accuracy and needle size, although a larger number of specimens were obtained using a thick needle [46][47][48].…”
Section: Soft Tissue Tumor Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation