2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2021.116489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image synthesis via adversarial geometric consistency pursuit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STRAT-hat STRAT-tie LSSIM↑ IoU↑ Disp↓ User↑ LSSIM↑ IoU↑ Disp↓ User↑ LSSIM↑ IoU↑ Disp↓ User↑ ST-GAN [26] 0.5655 0.5932 0.0240 7.1% 0.4362 0.6859 0.0316 9.0% 0.2780 0.1126 0.0440 8.4% ST-GAN (+s) [26] 0.6061 0.6579 0.0198 16.8% 0.5164 0.7455 0.0235 18.2% 0.2517 0.1211 0.0393 11.3% CompGAN [1] 0.5362 0.5593 0.0279 5.2% 0.4311 0.6675 0.0343 7.4% 0.2768 0.0918 0.0506 5.5% CompGAN (+s) [1] 0.5807 0.6353 0.0216 13.8% 0.5047 0.7303 0.0246 16.5% 0.2452 0.1064 0.0425 6.7% RegGAN [21] 0.5356 0.5069 0.0299 3.3% 0.4028 0.6147 0.0371 4.5% 0.2469 0.0792 0.0603 2.8% SF-GAN [45] 0.5406 0.5472 0.0267 4.9% 0.4140 0.6521 0.0365 5.7% 0.2575 0.0885 0.0544 4.4% AGCP [24] 0.5240 0.4750 0.0347 1.4% 0.3954 0.5981 0.0386 2.7% 0.2348 0.0641 0.0640 0.7% Ours 0.6886 0.7573 0.0145 47.5% 0.5470 0.7873 0.0184 36.0% 0.2883 0.3948 0.0131 60.2%…”
Section: Methods Strat-glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…STRAT-hat STRAT-tie LSSIM↑ IoU↑ Disp↓ User↑ LSSIM↑ IoU↑ Disp↓ User↑ LSSIM↑ IoU↑ Disp↓ User↑ ST-GAN [26] 0.5655 0.5932 0.0240 7.1% 0.4362 0.6859 0.0316 9.0% 0.2780 0.1126 0.0440 8.4% ST-GAN (+s) [26] 0.6061 0.6579 0.0198 16.8% 0.5164 0.7455 0.0235 18.2% 0.2517 0.1211 0.0393 11.3% CompGAN [1] 0.5362 0.5593 0.0279 5.2% 0.4311 0.6675 0.0343 7.4% 0.2768 0.0918 0.0506 5.5% CompGAN (+s) [1] 0.5807 0.6353 0.0216 13.8% 0.5047 0.7303 0.0246 16.5% 0.2452 0.1064 0.0425 6.7% RegGAN [21] 0.5356 0.5069 0.0299 3.3% 0.4028 0.6147 0.0371 4.5% 0.2469 0.0792 0.0603 2.8% SF-GAN [45] 0.5406 0.5472 0.0267 4.9% 0.4140 0.6521 0.0365 5.7% 0.2575 0.0885 0.0544 4.4% AGCP [24] 0.5240 0.4750 0.0347 1.4% 0.3954 0.5981 0.0386 2.7% 0.2348 0.0641 0.0640 0.7% Ours 0.6886 0.7573 0.0145 47.5% 0.5470 0.7873 0.0184 36.0% 0.2883 0.3948 0.0131 60.2%…”
Section: Methods Strat-glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare with previous methods [21,26], which focus on spatial transformation for image composition. We also compare with [1,24,45] which deal with both appearance and geometry inconsistency between foreground and background. In other words, they not only learn the warping parameters for the foreground object, but also adjust the appearance of foreground object.…”
Section: Comparison With Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations