Imagerie de la migration des dispositifs intra-utérins

Kettani, N. Ech-Cherif El; Dafiri, R.

doi:10.1016/s0181-9801(07)88852-x

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast to acute uterine perforation, which is often symptomatic and occurs during insertion, chronic perforation may occur at any time and is generally asymptomatic [2]. Several risk factors have been identified and can be classified into three categories [2-4]: (i) uterine factors: myometrial weakness (multiparity, Cesarean section), pronounced retro- or anteversion, uterine hypoplasia, insertion in the early post-partum period; (ii) IUD insertion technique including operator experience; and (iii) IUD type: perforation might be more frequent with copper IUDs [1]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bone single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography disclosing chronic uterine perforation with intrauterine device migration into the anterior wall of the bladder: a case report

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionExtraosseous uptake of 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate is a common situation of variable clinical relevance.Case presentationA 52-year-old Caucasian woman presented to our department for breast cancer staging. A 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scan was performed and showed focal pelvic hyperfixation that disclosed intrauterine device migration into the anterior wall of the bladder on single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography.ConclusionThis observation confirms the major role of single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography in achieving an exact diagnosis.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a review of the literature, we found 140 cases of intra-abdominal migration and 50 cases of intravesical migration of which 42.9 percent presented with lithiasis [2,4,5]. Indeed, calcification may occur when the IUD migrates into the bladder.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography disclosing chronic uterine perforation with intrauterine device migration into the anterior wall of the bladder: a case report

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Uterine Perforation after Pose of IUD, the Place of Abdomen Radiography without Preparation

Sermé¹,

Coulibaly²,

Somda³

et al. 2017

OJGas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Uterine perforation is a serious complication after insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD). We report the case of a 34-year-old woman receiving in consultation for abdominal pain. In the interrogation there was a notion of IUD insertion for about a week. The gynecological examination did not find the thread of IUD and the ultrasound performed did not visualize an IUD. Radiography of the abdomen without preparation highlighted a compatible intrapelvic foreign thing like an IUD. The diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease by uterine perforation by an IUD was thus retained. We suggest in case of suspicion of uterine radio paque IUD perforation achieving radiography when the abdominal pelvic ultrasound is normal.

show abstract

Successful Laparoscopic Management of a Migrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device in the Pelvic Cavity: A Case Report

Isidore,

Rakya,

Robert

et al. 2024

OJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An Intrauterine device (IUD) is a long-acting reversible contraceptive commonly used in clinical practice. Its insertion in the uterus is simple and safe. But sometimes, complications can occur. Case Report: Herein, we report a case of successful laparoscopic removal of a missing IUD Copper-T, mis-inserted in a 32-year-old woman, 4 months after she delivered by caesarian section, and presented persistent lower abdominal pain lasting 6 months. Uterine ultrasound was unremarkable, but a plain abdominopelvic X-ray confirmed the presence of the Copper-T inside the abdominal cavity. Conclusion: Insertion of IUD is simple and safe. When the diagnosis of uterine perforation following its insertion is clinically suspected and radiologically confirmed, laparoscopy, when available, remains one of the best options for removal.

show abstract

Imagerie de la migration des dispositifs intra-utérins

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Bone single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography disclosing chronic uterine perforation with intrauterine device migration into the anterior wall of the bladder: a case report

Bone single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography disclosing chronic uterine perforation with intrauterine device migration into the anterior wall of the bladder: a case report

Uterine Perforation after Pose of IUD, the Place of Abdomen Radiography without Preparation

Successful Laparoscopic Management of a Migrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device in the Pelvic Cavity: A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About