2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x22000048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaginary worlds through the evolutionary lens: Ultimate functions, proximate mechanisms, cultural distribution

Abstract: We received several commentaries both challenging and supporting our hypothesis. We thank the commentators for their thoughtful contributions, bringing together alternative hypotheses, complementary explanations, and appropriate corrections to our model. Here, we explain further our hypothesis, using more explicitly the framework of evolutionary social sciences. We first explain what we believe is the ultimate function of fiction in general (i.e., entertainment) and how this hypothesis differs from other evolu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further demonstrate that this difference translates in the cultural domain, impacting the reported preference for imaginary worlds in fiction. Besides, we show that the psychological trait of systemizing is highly correlated to exploratory preferences, supporting the hypothesis that systemizing is subsumed under the drive to explore that we coined environmental curiosity 175 . Under our theoretical account, systemizing is the labeling of an extreme form of information processing that this mechanism of curiosity about the physical world can take, which is indeed modulated by sex differences because of ancestral selection pressures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We further demonstrate that this difference translates in the cultural domain, impacting the reported preference for imaginary worlds in fiction. Besides, we show that the psychological trait of systemizing is highly correlated to exploratory preferences, supporting the hypothesis that systemizing is subsumed under the drive to explore that we coined environmental curiosity 175 . Under our theoretical account, systemizing is the labeling of an extreme form of information processing that this mechanism of curiosity about the physical world can take, which is indeed modulated by sex differences because of ancestral selection pressures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%