2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft Infections: A Consensus Paper amongst Different Specialists

Abstract: Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a rare but severe complication of vascular surgery that is associated with a bad prognosis and high mortality rate. An accurate and prompt identification of the infection and its extent is crucial for the correct management of the patient. However, standardized diagnostic algorithms and a univocal consensus on the best strategy to reach a diagnosis still do not exist. This review aims to summarize different radiological and Nuclear Medicine (NM) modalities commonly adopted for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several imaging modalities are currently used for diagnosis and follow-up of VGI [ 65 ]. From a radiologic point of view, CT and computed tomography angiography (CTA) represent the gold standard imaging modalities for their ability to provide an anatomical overview of vascular tree and to detect suggestive signs for infection (peri-graft gas or fluid collection, fistulae, adjacent soft tissue abscesses).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several imaging modalities are currently used for diagnosis and follow-up of VGI [ 65 ]. From a radiologic point of view, CT and computed tomography angiography (CTA) represent the gold standard imaging modalities for their ability to provide an anatomical overview of vascular tree and to detect suggestive signs for infection (peri-graft gas or fluid collection, fistulae, adjacent soft tissue abscesses).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, well-standardized acquisition protocols and interpretation criteria still do not exist in the specific field of VGI [27]. From several metaanalysis and systematic reviews emerges a high sensitivity but a low specificity for this modality [65,[68][69][70], mainly related to the high rate of false positives results that may be observed in presence of physiological post-surgical inflammation due to foreign body reaction induced by synthetic materials [71,72]. In one of the most recently published systematic reviews and meta-analysis, [69] the reported pooled sensitivity is 96%, ranging from 81% [73] and 100% [72,[74][75][76], whereas the reported pool specificity is 74%, ranging between 29% [77] and 92% [78].…”
Section: Role Of [ 18 F]fdg Pet/ct In Vascular Graft Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CTA analysis and interpretation, see Tables 2 and 4. In doubtful cases, WBC-SPECT can further help define the presence/absence of infection at the vascular graft (76).…”
Section: Image Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doubtful cases, WBC-SPECT can further help define the presence/absence of infection at the vascular graft. 36 …”
Section: Specific Scoring Interpretation and Reporting Criteria For mentioning
confidence: 99%