2005
DOI: 10.1007/11505730_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imaging Tumor Microenvironment with Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However preliminary results have shown that T 1 in normal breast tissue is on the order of 3 s and T 2 is of order 60 s (Sridhar et al 2006a), and the viscoelastic amplitudes ε 1 and ε 2 are several times greater than for gelatin. Together these findings help explain why we have been able to obtain T 1 images in breast patient studies with 20 s acquisitions but not T 2 (Sridhar and Insana 2005).…”
Section: Acquisition Time and Contrastmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However preliminary results have shown that T 1 in normal breast tissue is on the order of 3 s and T 2 is of order 60 s (Sridhar et al 2006a), and the viscoelastic amplitudes ε 1 and ε 2 are several times greater than for gelatin. Together these findings help explain why we have been able to obtain T 1 images in breast patient studies with 20 s acquisitions but not T 2 (Sridhar and Insana 2005).…”
Section: Acquisition Time and Contrastmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The polysaccharide gel plays a major role in determining the viscoelastic properties of the stroma and is responsible for material properties (Fung 1993, Gordenne et al 1985, Stoeckelhuber et al 2002. Gelatin does not have a polysaccharide gel, and yet its mechanical properties can be adjusted to approximate those of soft tissues by adding chemical cross-linkers (Madsen et al 2005) or by adjusting pH to vary the ionic concentration (Sridhar and Insana 2005). In addition, gelatin properties are much more sensitive to thermal and mechanical histories (Ward andCourts 1977, Hoffman 1991) than living stroma because the aggregate structure of denatured collagen molecules in gelatin is less stable than the triple helical structure of collagen in stromal ECM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 However, this method is prone to error in noisy conditions. In the works of Sridhar et al, [14][15][16] the authors used a traditional curve peeling/stripping method first, and then fine-tuned the obtained estimates using a nonlinear Gauss-Newton fitting technique blended with the LM method. In another work, 17 they estimated the strain TC and steady-state values searching poles and zeros in the Laplace domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesion areas are brighter, indicating that mechanisms take longer due to the increased collagen density when compared to softer background areas. ϵ 0 , T 1 , and T 2 are the three parameters currently used for viscoelastic imaging [46]. The measurements of Fig.…”
Section: Image Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method A is often used to acquire time sequences of axial strain images ϵ 11 (x,t) by flush mounting a linear array transducer into the compression plate [46], as shown in Fig. 5(a).…”
Section: Viscoelastic Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%