2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immediate and Two-year Outcomes after EVAR in “On-label” and “Off-label” Neck Anatomies Using Different Commercially Available Devices. Analysis of the Experience of Two Italian Vascular Centers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with more than two Boff-label^aortic neck features-defined as non-cylindrical, angulated, short, or enlarged-underwent more intraoperative adjunctive procedures and had higher rates of intraoperative endoleaks and all-cause mortality. However, at 2-year follow-up, both groups had similar rates of AAA-related death and rupture [7]. A review of over 10,000 patients revealed that only 42 % had anatomy that was compliant with anatomic IFU guidelines.…”
Section: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far Towards Evar?mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Patients with more than two Boff-label^aortic neck features-defined as non-cylindrical, angulated, short, or enlarged-underwent more intraoperative adjunctive procedures and had higher rates of intraoperative endoleaks and all-cause mortality. However, at 2-year follow-up, both groups had similar rates of AAA-related death and rupture [7]. A review of over 10,000 patients revealed that only 42 % had anatomy that was compliant with anatomic IFU guidelines.…”
Section: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far Towards Evar?mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In particular, EVAR is also becoming the method of choice for aneurysmal sac exclusion in vascular patients with difficult vascular anatomies due to its favourable outcomes, customised approach and easy technical execution[23-25]. Despite these advantages some articles debate the risk of long-term lifelong EVAR CT follow-up, with a remarkable amount of radiation exposure carrying the risk of developing cancers; moreover they report the need of dose optimisations using new targeted CT protocols, considering that the absorbed dose by the patient differs on the basis different scanners, patient body size and age[26-28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results confirm the possibility of using DTA combined with CEUS as a cost-effective diagnostic protocol alternative to CTA in EVAR followup. This diagnostic protocol has the potential to limit the use of CTA in doubtful cases and cases requiring reintervention or with an unfavorable anatomy, significantly reducing costs and risk of CIN as well as overall radiation dose received by patients [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%