Immediate implant placement with and without provisionalization: A comparison of a one-year longitudinal study

Fu, Po-Sung; Tseng, Feng-Jen; Lan, Ting-Hsun; Lai, Pei Ling; Chen, Cheng-Hwei; Chen, Jen-Hao; Liu, Chih-Te; Chen, Wen Cheng; Hung, Chun-Cheng

doi:10.1016/j.jds.2023.04.029

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL) was evaluated t 1 = 0, t 2 = 6, and t 3 = 12 months after delivering the prostheses using a standardized periapical digital radiograph (Soredex Digora Optime, Finland) with a size-2 sensor and a film holder (Kerr, Kerr dental, Switzerland). All the follow-up and baseline radiographic images were standardized using the same film holder in parallel [ 38 , 39 ]. An occlusal bite index made of high-viscosity additional silicone putty material (Zhermack SpA, Badia Polesine, Italy) was utilized for bite registration to guarantee that the film was placed correctly while taking follow-up radiographs, providing reproducible periapical radiographs [ 26 , 32 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) used in alveolar ridge preservation on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues: a randomized clinical trial

Azangookhiavi,

Habibzadeh,

Zahmatkesh

et al. 2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The effectiveness of alveolar ridge preservation on bone regeneration and tissue healing has been thoroughly documented in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the peri-implant soft and hard tissue changes after alveolar ridge preservation using either platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) or freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) over a 12-month period following the prosthetic loading of implants. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, 40 individuals were recruited for alveolar ridge preservation using (1) FDBA or (2) PRF in incisal/premolar areas. At two follow-up sessions (six- and 12-months post-implant insertion), radiographic imaging and clinical examinations assessed marginal bone loss and soft tissue factors, including gingival recession and bleeding on probing. The differences between study groups were analyzed using Generalized estimating Equations, the Binary logistic regression model, and Cochran’s Q test. Results There was a statistically significant difference regarding gingival recession at both follow-up evaluations; values in the PRF group were considerably lower compared to the FDBA group (p < 0.05). The mean values for vertical marginal bone loss and bleeding on probing showed no significant differences between the two study groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions Except for gingival recession, applying PRF yielded comparable clinical results to FDBA after one year of implant loading and could be recommended as a potential biomaterial for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extractions. Clinical trial registration The research protocol was registered in the Protocol Registration and Results System on 13/08/2021, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT05005377).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) used in alveolar ridge preservation on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues: a randomized clinical trial

Azangookhiavi,

Habibzadeh,

Zahmatkesh

et al. 2024

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Comparison of implant stability and marginal bone loss between osseodensification and conventional osteotomy at adjacent implant sites

Fu,

Du,

Tseng

et al. 2024

Journal of Dental Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial

Elsheikh,

Abdelsameaa,

Elbahnasi

et al. 2023

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla. Materials and methods Thirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant. Patients were randomly distributed into three equal groups, twelve implants in each group. Group 1 received Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) into the jumping distance, Group 2 received Xenograft into the jumping distance and Group 3 received Alloplastic bone grafting material into the jumping distance. Implant stability by measuring the changes in Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness were evaluated during follow up periods. All the clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis by One Way ANOVA test and the Post Hoc Tukey test. Results This study involved 19 female patients and 17 male patients who received 36 dental implants. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding implant stability, peri-implant pocket depth and palatal bone loss, while there was a significant difference between PRF Group (Group 1) and the other Groups regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. Conclusion PRF can be used as a gap filling material in conjunction with immediate implant placement, but other bone grafting materials give superior result regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness. Trial registration The study was listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov with registration number (NCT05878392) on 26/05/2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, approved the current study in compliance with the seventh revision of the Helsinki Declaration in 2013 (A0103023OS).

show abstract

Immediate implant placement with and without provisionalization: A comparison of a one-year longitudinal study

Cited by 3 publications

References 19 publications

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) used in alveolar ridge preservation on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues: a randomized clinical trial

The effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) versus freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) used in alveolar ridge preservation on the peri-implant soft and hard tissues: a randomized clinical trial

Comparison of implant stability and marginal bone loss between osseodensification and conventional osteotomy at adjacent implant sites

Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About