Immediate Implants Placed in Fresh Sockets Associated with Periapical Pathology: A Split‐Mouth Design and Survival Evaluation after 1‐Year Follow‐Up

Hita-Iglesias, Cristina; Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisco; Montero, Javier; Galindo‐Moreno, Pablo; Mesa, Francisco; Martínez-Lara, Ildefonso; Sánchez-Fernández, Elena

doi:10.1111/cid.12387

Cited by 17 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 40 publications

(102 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although all four sites with initial periapical radiolucency in our study healed uneventfully, Hita‐Iglesias et al. () reported higher complication rates in sites with larger than 4‐mm peri‐apical lesions.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 47%

Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap‐involving approach: a randomized controlled trial

Stoupel

Lee

Glick

et al. 2016

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 47%

Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap‐involving approach: a randomized controlled trial

Stoupel

Lee

Glick

et al. 2016

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…All of the studies were of a parallel and prospective design except one (Hita‐Iglesias et al, 2016) that was split‐mouth design.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In eleven studies (8,9,18,21,32,33,36,43,45,47,49), the immediate DI arms of CCTs were included in the analysis. All of the studies were of a parallel and prospective design except one (Hita-Iglesias et al, 2016) that was split-mouth design.…”

Section: Studies Answering Focus Questionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

García-Sánchez

Dopico

Kalemaj³

et al. 2022

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Two focused questions were addressed: Focused question (Q1) 1) Are there any differences between immediate and delayed placement in terms of (i) survival rate, (ii) success rate, (iii) radiographic marginal bone levels, (iv) height/(v)thickness of buccal wall, (vi) peri-implant mucosal margin position, (vii) aesthetics outcomes and (viii) patient reported outcomes? Focused question 2 (Q2) What is the estimated effect size of immediate implant placement for all parameters included in Q1? Materials and methods: An electronic search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and OpenGray) and hand search were conducted up to November 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) with delayed implant placement as controls were eligible in the analysis for Q1. Immediate dental implant arms RCTs, controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and prospective case series of immediate implant placement were eligible in the analysis for Q2.Results: Six papers (RCTs) were included in the analysis for Q1 and 53 papers ( 22RCTs, 11 CCTs and 20 case series) for Q2. Q1: Meta-analyses did not show any significant difference in implant survival, but it did for bone levels and PES scores at 1 year post-loading, favouring the immediate group. Q2: Meta-analyses showed that immediate implants had a high survival rate (97%) and presented high PES scores (range 10.36 to 11.25). Information regarding marginal bone loss and gingival/papillary recession varied among all included studies. Conclusion:Similar survival rate was found between immediate and delayed implants.Immediate implants presented threefold early complications and twofold delayed complications. Success criteria should be reported more consistently, and the incidence/type of complications associated with immediate implants should be further explored. Radiographic bone loss. (Mmesial, D-Distal) Gingival margin recession immediate (mm) PES immediate Papilla fill immediate Pat. Reported outcomes No No No No No M mean gain of 0.18 ± 1.38 mm, D mean gain of 0.34 ± 1.40 m Mean recession of 0.29 ± 0.74 mm 11.25 ± 1.36 at 5 years Mesial mean recession of 0.05 ± 0.64 mm and Distal 0.16 ± 0.63 mm, No 0.72 ± 0.13 (SE) No No No No MAX imp. 1.36 ± 0.78(SD). MND imp. 1.54 ± 0.91(SD).

show abstract

“…A number of studies have identified the various potential factors that may influence marginal bone loss around the implant and thus the survival rate of immediate implantation. Some factors are related to the patient's condition, such as bone quality and quantity, smoking habit, periodontal disease, and the condition of the extraction socket . Others are related to the implant design, implant surface, and implant‐abutment microgap .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Submerged and Nonsubmerged Bone‐Level Implants with Internal Hexagonal Connections in Immediate Implantation: A 5‐Year Retrospective Study

Shrestha

et al. 2017

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Immediate Implants Placed in Fresh Sockets Associated with Periapical Pathology: A Split‐Mouth Design and Survival Evaluation after 1‐Year Follow‐Up

Abstract: Implant survival rates were significantly lower after the immediate implantation in postextraction sockets associated with chronic periapical disease (90.8%) than in healthy postextraction sockets (98.1%).

Cited by 17 publications

References 40 publications

Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap‐involving approach: a randomized controlled trial

Immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the aesthetic zone using a flapless or a flap‐involving approach: a randomized controlled trial

Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Submerged and Nonsubmerged Bone‐Level Implants with Internal Hexagonal Connections in Immediate Implantation: A 5‐Year Retrospective Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About