2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in health care workers following a COVID-19 outbreak: A prospective longitudinal study

Abstract: Objective Currently, little is known about the progression of an immune response against SARSCoV- 2 upon infection or sub-infection-exposure over time. We examined the serologic response in healthcare workers up to 12 weeks after a well-documented and contained outbreak and compared results with findings from earlier serologic testing in the same population. Methods This study followed 166 health care workers of the University Perinatal Care Center, Regensburg, Germany,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
47
2
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
47
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We furthermore corroborate prior findings of strong concordance between SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG and virus neutralization capacity, supporting a longlasting and durable immunity after COVID-19 infection also in individuals with no or mild symptoms. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG, however, declined in individuals with asymptomatic to mild COVID-19 disease, implying that this antigen may not be a useful target in long-term serological population studies.Our findings of a durable IgG response are consistent with recent studies showing stable antibody levels for up to 2-6 months(16)(17)(18)(19). Several other studies, however, report a rapid decline in circulating SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (10-12), especially after mild disease(13)(14)(15).Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a plethora of serological assays have emerged, using different methods such as ELISA, CLIA, lateral flow and multiplex systems(23).Although the discrepancies regarding the longevity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may well stem from variations in sensitivity and specificity of these assays, the target antigen of choice is a likely contributing factor.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We furthermore corroborate prior findings of strong concordance between SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG and virus neutralization capacity, supporting a longlasting and durable immunity after COVID-19 infection also in individuals with no or mild symptoms. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG, however, declined in individuals with asymptomatic to mild COVID-19 disease, implying that this antigen may not be a useful target in long-term serological population studies.Our findings of a durable IgG response are consistent with recent studies showing stable antibody levels for up to 2-6 months(16)(17)(18)(19). Several other studies, however, report a rapid decline in circulating SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (10-12), especially after mild disease(13)(14)(15).Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic a plethora of serological assays have emerged, using different methods such as ELISA, CLIA, lateral flow and multiplex systems(23).Although the discrepancies regarding the longevity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may well stem from variations in sensitivity and specificity of these assays, the target antigen of choice is a likely contributing factor.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The kinetics, duration and efficacy of circulating SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are however, due to the novelty of the virus, less established. In fact, conflicting studies provide data on a rapid decline in circulating IgG antibodies within weeks after COVID-19 (10)(11)(12), especially after mild disease (13)(14)(15), while others report detectable antibodies up to two to six months after symptom onset (16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weak or even lack of seroconversion after initial PCR positivity was reported among some COVID-19 patients during variable periods of follow-up, leaving these individuals susceptible to infection or relapse ( Papachristodoulou et al 2020 ). For example, 22% of 27 patients did not develop a serologic response after 60 days of follow-up in Germany; ( Fill Malfertheiner et al, 2020 ) 20% of 173 Chinese patients did not develop IgG after two weeks of onset; ( Zhao et al, 2020 ) 6% did not show any antibody response two weeks after hospital discharge and 30% of 175 patients showed very low neutralizing antibody titres in Shanghai, China; ( Wu et al, 2020 ) and one of 14 (7%) HCWs had not seroconverted after 17 days of follow-up in the UK. ( Houlihan et al, 2020 ) Among this Egyptian HCW cohort, 66.7% of 45 seronegative HCWs who tested PCR-positive only at baseline did not seroconvert after three weeks of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 61 However, some infected individuals did not seroconvert or their antibody titers waned within short periods of time following initial production. 117 , 161 , 162 , 198 , 199 …”
Section: Reasons For False Negatives In Antibody Immunoassaysmentioning
confidence: 99%