2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoanalytical methods for ochratoxin A monitoring in wine and must based on innovative immunoreagents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Figure 3 that the average IC50 value calculated from standard curves obtained on six consecutive days was 34.8 pg mL −1 , while the limit of detection (LOD) of the ELISA based on three times the standard deviation (3×SD) at zero concentration was found to be 1.5 pg mL −1 . In the last decades, many ELISAs for the detection of OTA in food samples based on pAb or mAb have been developed [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. As shown in Table 1, the IC50 (or LOD) value achieved in our ELISA is about 1.53~147 times lower than those obtained in other ELISAs, which clearly demonstrates the high sensitivity of our ELISA.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of the Elisa For Otamentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from Figure 3 that the average IC50 value calculated from standard curves obtained on six consecutive days was 34.8 pg mL −1 , while the limit of detection (LOD) of the ELISA based on three times the standard deviation (3×SD) at zero concentration was found to be 1.5 pg mL −1 . In the last decades, many ELISAs for the detection of OTA in food samples based on pAb or mAb have been developed [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. As shown in Table 1, the IC50 (or LOD) value achieved in our ELISA is about 1.53~147 times lower than those obtained in other ELISAs, which clearly demonstrates the high sensitivity of our ELISA.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of the Elisa For Otamentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the last decades, many immunoassays using different signal readouts, such as chemiluminescence [20], time-resolved fluorescence [21], electrochemical [22], etc., have reported the detection of OTA. Also, many polyclonal antibody (pAb)or monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based indirect competitive ELISAs (ic-ELISA) and direct competitive ELISAs (dc-ELISA) have been developed for the detection OTA in food samples (Table 1) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Usually, for the developed immunoassays, the first purpose is to achieve the high sensitivity of the assay for the target analyte.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different mycotoxins have been found not only in fruits and vegetables but also in their derivative products [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The mycotoxins commonly found in fruits and vegetables can be divided into four major categories: PAT, TCs, OTA and ATs.…”
Section: Occurrence Contamination and Toxicity Of Mycotoxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, numerous analytical techniques have been developed to detect OTA, including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [ 12 ], liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [ 13 ], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [ 14 ], lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) [ 15 ] and biosensors [ 16 ]. Among these, ELISA is the most commonly used rapid screening method due to its high throughput and simple operations [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%