2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.03.502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells is sex dependent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the aims of our study was to examine potential sex differences in the viability, proliferation, and differentiation potential in cells from dogs and cats. Sex-related differences have been previously reported in regard to the neurogenic potential ( 54 , 55 ), immunomodulation ( 56 ), and therapeutic efficacy ( 57 ) of stem cells in humans and animal models. In our study, the only differences between sexes were observed in osteogenic potential, which was different with cells from dogs and cats at passage 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the aims of our study was to examine potential sex differences in the viability, proliferation, and differentiation potential in cells from dogs and cats. Sex-related differences have been previously reported in regard to the neurogenic potential ( 54 , 55 ), immunomodulation ( 56 ), and therapeutic efficacy ( 57 ) of stem cells in humans and animal models. In our study, the only differences between sexes were observed in osteogenic potential, which was different with cells from dogs and cats at passage 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, male cells secreted significantly higher amounts of immunomodulatory cytokines (4 out of 6 analyzed cytokines: GAL9, IL10, IL1B, and MMP3) compared to female cells ( Figure 7B ) consistent with our gene expression data. This suggests there are significant sex-based differences in immunomodulatory potential of these hMSCs, and this has been observed in vitro [70, 71] by other groups. As seen in Table 1 various donors had co-morbidities while for others such health information was not provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%