Heat Exchangers - Basics Design Applications 2012
DOI: 10.5772/33111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a Medium Flow Maldistribution on a Cross-Flow Heat Exchanger Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This short review of available results concerning the impact of media flow maldistribution in heat exchangers shows that this problem could be significant. The results obtained by the authors and presented partially in (Bury et al, 2009;Bury, 2012) are comparable with outcomes of other researchers. There is however still some gap in experimental works concerning improvement of efficiency of heat exchangers operating in non-uniform media flow conditions.…”
Section: Figure 1 Testing Station -The Air Supply Modulesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This short review of available results concerning the impact of media flow maldistribution in heat exchangers shows that this problem could be significant. The results obtained by the authors and presented partially in (Bury et al, 2009;Bury, 2012) are comparable with outcomes of other researchers. There is however still some gap in experimental works concerning improvement of efficiency of heat exchangers operating in non-uniform media flow conditions.…”
Section: Figure 1 Testing Station -The Air Supply Modulesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The researches realized in the next steps, also for other heat exchangers of the same type, allowed for validation of the HEWES code and have confirmed initial observations: non-uniform flow of media may significantly affect the heat exchanger efficiencythe deterioration of the total heat flow rate transported in the device have reached up to 20%, while average values are about 15% for analyzed cases (Bury, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%