2020
DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2020.1866603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of different nutrient sources on forage yield, nutritive value and economics of sorghum sudan grass hybrid-Oat cropping system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation results showed that the addition of probiotics and different levels of P fertilizer had no significant effect (p>0.05) on the content of ADF, NDF, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The results of this study are in contrast to the report of [42] that the application of biofertilizer reduces the ADF and NDF content of the sorghum sudan grass hybrid. The fiber fraction content of the whole plant brown midrib sorghum mutant line is present in Table 7.…”
Section: The Fiber Fraction Content Of Sorghum Whole Plantcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation results showed that the addition of probiotics and different levels of P fertilizer had no significant effect (p>0.05) on the content of ADF, NDF, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The results of this study are in contrast to the report of [42] that the application of biofertilizer reduces the ADF and NDF content of the sorghum sudan grass hybrid. The fiber fraction content of the whole plant brown midrib sorghum mutant line is present in Table 7.…”
Section: The Fiber Fraction Content Of Sorghum Whole Plantcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Leaves contain a lower fiber fraction than stems. According to [42], leaves lignification is lower than stems by limiting the synthesis of polysaccharides such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, which results in higher fiber content. In addition, there is no significant difference in the fiber fraction content, which is related to the non-significant difference in DM content because DM includes cellulose, carbohydrates, structural components, and organic and inorganic material that builds the plant [41].…”
Section: The Fiber Fraction Content Of Sorghum Whole Plantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the higher RPRI under N 2 and N 1 options was owing to their low CoC and higher gross returns resulting from higher green fodder yield. Chahal et al (2021) also reported the better economics of oats under plots receiving FYM @10 t ha -1 along with Azotobacter and PSB than control. Hossain et al (2017) also reported the significance of green fodder for…”
Section: Economicsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, among the three mowing treatments, fresh grass yield, hay yield and dry‐fresh ratio increased in the second forage crop, whereas hay yield and the dry‐fresh ratio continued to increase because mowing facilitated dry matter accumulation (Hanson et al, 1988). Mowing significantly reduced the stem‐to‐leaf ratio, thereby improving the palatability of the forage throughout the mowing period (Chahal et al, 2020). These results suggest that mowing can effectively improve forage production performance and has a significant effect on the morphological development of forage (Fontes et al, 2014; Liu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%