2017
DOI: 10.2174/1874282301711010088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Energetic Electron Precipitation on the Upper Atmosphere: Nitric Monoxide

Abstract: Abstract:Background:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note IRI2016 does not provide We have plotted the production and loss rates of NO + and  2 N in Figures 2 and 3. The electron impact production profile of NO + is taken from (Vialatte et al, 2017) and the loss from our model is calculated by: ∑ s l is n i , where the summation is over species s. We note that for the loss of NO + the only significant reaction is R10, which represents ion recombination. Other loss reaction (R1 -R6) have minimal effect since the maximum value of the loss rate is about 10 −9 cm −3 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note IRI2016 does not provide We have plotted the production and loss rates of NO + and  2 N in Figures 2 and 3. The electron impact production profile of NO + is taken from (Vialatte et al, 2017) and the loss from our model is calculated by: ∑ s l is n i , where the summation is over species s. We note that for the loss of NO + the only significant reaction is R10, which represents ion recombination. Other loss reaction (R1 -R6) have minimal effect since the maximum value of the loss rate is about 10 −9 cm −3 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results are obtained for local times between 1.5 and 2.5 h. The modeled and empirical (IRI2016) values of NO + and N2+ ion densities are shown as a function of height in Figure 1 including electron precipitation and for medium magnetic activity. Note that results are limited to a maximum altitude of 300 km because production data needed to calculate NO + densities are only available to this altitude (Vialatte et al., 2017). Below 94 km altitude there is a good agreement between modeled and IRI NO + densities, but above 94 km there is a relatively large difference between the two.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations