2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of NAPL architecture on interphase mass transfer: A pore network study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical dissolution modeling results match the experimental effluent concentration data extremely well (Aydin‐Sarikurt et al, ; Figure ). Additional validation of the formulation presented above has been presented by Agaoglu et al () for residual dissolution type experiments. We also generated the same results of (Agaoglu et al, ; section 2.3) using our code.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The numerical dissolution modeling results match the experimental effluent concentration data extremely well (Aydin‐Sarikurt et al, ; Figure ). Additional validation of the formulation presented above has been presented by Agaoglu et al () for residual dissolution type experiments. We also generated the same results of (Agaoglu et al, ; section 2.3) using our code.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We use this approach in our work. Dissolution rate coefficient of NAPL as an upscaled mass transfer coefficient is calculated based on the simulated NAPL concentration of pores in the pore network model (Agaoglu et al, ): Kf=()Mt()1A()1CsC where A is the overall interfacial area (interphase mass transfer area) in the pore network, that is, the summation of cross‐sectional areas of the throats, which connect NAPL‐filled pores with water‐filled pores. The concentration, C , is defined as the average resident concentration of NAPL in the aqueous phase over the entire pore network model.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Particularly for supercritical CO 2 under larger buoyancy forces, the faster growth of perturbations existed over time, which can provoke a more complicated structure of fingers and also more CO 2 dissolution into brine [17]. In contrast, the CO 2 bubbles located parallel to the flow direction led to more bypass trapping and lower average effluent concentrations [26]. The CO 2 bubbles, which were bound by the bypass flow, generally had low connectivity to the surrounding brine, or were isolated in the large pores through the connected pore throats (shown in Figure 2 R4).…”
Section: Pore-scale Co 2 Dissolution and Flow Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion-type partial differential equations (PDEs) on connected graphs arise as relevant mathematical models for transport phenomena in environmental [1,2], biological [3], and material problems [4,5]. Here a connected graph is defined as an union of 0-D vertices that links 1-D intervals [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%