Impact of older age on the long-term survival in living-donor liver transplantation: A propensity score matching analysis

Avanaz, Ali; Doğru, Volkan; Kısaoğlu, Abdullah; Yılmaz, Vural Taner; Ünal, Demet Sarıdemir; Demiryılmaz, İsmail; Dinc, Bora; Adanir, Haydar; Aydınlı, Bülent

doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.061

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, as specific comparison between older and younger recipients was not performed 28 . Most of the other reported experience is from single center reports, evaluating outcomes of adults ≥60–65y compared to younger LDLT recipients 29–36 . The present study is the first, to the best of our knowledge, specifically comparing outcomes of adult recipients ≥70y old undergoing LDLT versus DDLT.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Survival after LDLT in recipients ≥70 years old in the United States. An OPTN/UNOS liver transplant registry analysis

Robinson,

Vargas,

Oberholzer

et al. 2023

Clinical Transplantation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the elderly population is currently not well studied. There are single‐center studies indicating that patient age should not be a barrier to LDLT, with similar outcomes compared to younger recipients.MethodsUsing UNOS/STAR data from 2010 to 2022 we retrospectively analyzed patients ≥70 years old receiving a living donor graft (LDLT ≥70y group) versus a deceased donor graft (DDLT ≥70y group). In addition, we compared recipients ≥70 years old undergoing LDLT versus patients 18–69 years old also undergoing LDLT. Donor and recipient baseline characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes including graft and patient survival were analyzed and compared between groups.ResultsRecipients in the LDLT ≥70y group showed less disease burden and spent significantly less time on the waitlist when compared to recipients in the DDLT ≥70y group (102 [49–201] days versus 170 [36–336] days) respectively; p = .004. With the exception of a longer length of stay (LOS) in the LDLT ≥70y group (p ≤ .001), postoperative outcomes were comparable with recipients in the DDLT ≥70y group, including similar graft and patient survival rates at 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐years. When compared to younger recipients of a graft from a living donor, patients in the LDLT ≥70y group had similar post‐transplant functional status, re‐transplant rates and similar causes contributing to graft failure. However, significantly lower graft and patient survival rates were observed.ConclusionLDLT for recipients aged 70 or greater represents a faster access to transplantation in a safe and feasible manner when compared to similar‐ aged recipients undergoing DDLT.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%