2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-022-04170-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of processing parameters on the quality attributes of spray-dried powders: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be explained by the larger MD concentration in ET1. Maltodextrin acts as a volume agent that affects porosity, and as porosity increases, wettability does as well [63]. This effect was described by Caliskan et al's [62] research, which noticed that an increment in maltodextrin concentration in the sumac spray drying caused a significant decrease in wettability times.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This might be explained by the larger MD concentration in ET1. Maltodextrin acts as a volume agent that affects porosity, and as porosity increases, wettability does as well [63]. This effect was described by Caliskan et al's [62] research, which noticed that an increment in maltodextrin concentration in the sumac spray drying caused a significant decrease in wettability times.…”
Section: Physicochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…When the outlet temperature increased from 82 • C to about 90 • C, the MC and EY TFC tended to decrease, while the other responses increased significantly, followed by a contrasting trend. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that increasing outlet drying temperature would lead to overheating of the particles [29]. At this time, water quickly evaporates, reducing humidity, and destroying wall layers and bioactive compounds inside the core, due to direct contact with high-temperature conditions.…”
Section: Fitting the Response Surface Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, drying contributes to around 20%–25% of the energy consumption in the food industry (Ananno et al., 2020), whereas this sector overall constitutes 30% of the global energy consumption (Nabavi‐Pelesaraei et al., 2019). Various other challenges, such as the cost implications of specific drying technologies (such as freeze‐drying [FD]) (Fan et al., 2019) and the difficulty of drying sugar‐rich products and heat‐sensitive products during spray‐drying (SD) and drum‐drying (DD), respectively (George et al., 2023; Qiu, Boom, et al., 2019; Sobulska & Zbicinski, 2021a; Yamato et al., 2020), present substantial hurdles in the food drying process. The development of efficient drying technologies is crucial to addressing the major issues that arose with conventional technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%