1994
DOI: 10.1080/00207549408957019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of sequence-dependent setup time on job shop scheduling performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown that some fundamental dominance properties are lost when considering simple extensions of the nondelay and Giffler-Thompson SGSs based on operation appending to sequence-dependent setup times, as performed by most previous studies on priority rule-based heuristics for the SDST-JSP in the literature, e.g. Allahverdi, Gupta and Aldowaisan (1999) [11] Kim and Bobrowski (1994), [14] and Ovacik and Uzsoy (1994). On the other hand, we have demonstrated that the serial algorithm based on operation insertion (Kolisch (1996)) has the ability to generate a dominant set of schedules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We have shown that some fundamental dominance properties are lost when considering simple extensions of the nondelay and Giffler-Thompson SGSs based on operation appending to sequence-dependent setup times, as performed by most previous studies on priority rule-based heuristics for the SDST-JSP in the literature, e.g. Allahverdi, Gupta and Aldowaisan (1999) [11] Kim and Bobrowski (1994), [14] and Ovacik and Uzsoy (1994). On the other hand, we have demonstrated that the serial algorithm based on operation insertion (Kolisch (1996)) has the ability to generate a dominant set of schedules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Entretanto, se forem completamente diferentes, o tempo será proporcionalmente maior. Kim & Bobrowski (1994) definem assim a importância do tempo de setup: (1) o tempo de setup constitui parte do tempo de fluxo que afeta diretamente a taxa de saída do sistema de produção; (2) o custo da unidade do tempo de setup usualmente é mais alto que o custo unitário do tempo de processamento, uma vez que envolve o custo da máquina parada e o custo da mão-de-obra de um técnico especializado; e (3) o setup pode, com freqüência, precisar ser executado por um técnico com alto nível de especialização, o qual é um recurso limitado e nem sempre disponível.…”
Section: Impacto Dos Tempos De Setup Na Eficiência Do Sistemaunclassified
“…While this may be acceptable for scheduling in some production environments, in many others sequence-dependent set-up times need to be taken into consideration separately. In this situation, shop performance cannot be effectively improved without the aid of appropriate scheduling procedures which take set-up times into account (Kim and Bobrowski, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allahverdi et al 1999, 2008, Cheng et al, 2000, Liu and Chang 2000and Norman 1999, few studies have been reported on dynamic jobbing and flow-shops with sequence dependent set-up times. Two examples are the works by Kim and Bobrowski (1994) and recently by Vinod and Sridharan (2009). Both studied dynamic job shops with sequence-dependent set-ups using computer simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%