11th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium. NETWORKS 2004, 2004
DOI: 10.1109/netwks.2004.241054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the reach distance of WDM systems on the cost of translucent optical transport networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motivation and results found in [19] and [20] are the most closely and explicitly connected to the approach and the contributions of the present paper. More precisely, [19] tests the correlation between optical reach and network performance, using analytical modeling of impairments.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The motivation and results found in [19] and [20] are the most closely and explicitly connected to the approach and the contributions of the present paper. More precisely, [19] tests the correlation between optical reach and network performance, using analytical modeling of impairments.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 54%
“…More precisely, [19] tests the correlation between optical reach and network performance, using analytical modeling of impairments. Despite not taking a minimum-cost approach for the network being designed, the aforementioned work still has great value in modeling and evaluating the impact of a group of physical impairments to optical network design.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) is the objective function that maximizes the number of lightpaths that can be successfully established over the network (z p = 1, only if lightpath p can be accommodated in the network). Constraint (17) replaces Constraint (2), so that the flow constraints are satisfied only for the lightpaths that are actually established (i.e., those for which z p = 1). Constraint (18) replaces Constraint (3), which ensures that no edge is allocated on the physical route for lightpath p, if it is not successfully accommodated (i.e., if z p = 0).…”
Section: Ilp Modification For Maximizing Established Lightpathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, physical impairments such as crosstalk, chromatic dispersion, polarization mode dispersion and amplifier noise can lead to significant deterioration of the transmitted signal as it travels along an established lightpath [1]. The optical reach [2] is the maximum distance that the optical signal can travel, along a lightpath, before regeneration is required to maintain acceptable quality of transmission (QoT). Typically, such regeneration involves reshaping, retiming, and reamplification of the signal (known as 3R regeneration) and requires O-E-O conversion at the regeneration site(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of dispersion compensation modules is considered in this study [8]. More specifically, physical impairments, such as chromatic dispersion, polarization mode dispersion, amplified spontaneous emission (ASE), and propagation losses are converted to one single constraint: optimal reach limit.…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%