2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60572-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Sub-Resting Membrane Potential on Accurate Inference in Spiking Neural Networks

Abstract: Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are considered as the third generation of artificial neural networks, having the potential to improve the energy efficiency of conventional computing systems. Although the firing rate of a spiking neuron is an approximation of rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation in an analogvalued neural network (ANN), there remain many challenges to be overcome owing to differences in operation between ANNs and SNNs. Unlike actual biological and biophysical processes, various hardware implem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For high performance in HNNs, various synaptic arrays and neuron circuits suitable for efficient architectures and learning algorithms have been researched [4][5][6][7][8]. Specifically, both excitatory (G + ) and inhibitory (G -) synaptic arrays are important to improve the accuracy of HNNs [9][10][11]. Neuron circuits that use large capacitors (≥ 0.1 pF) and many transistors (≥ 11 MOSFETs) to process simultaneously signals from these two types of synapses have been reported [11][12][13], resulting in increased power consumption and a larger area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For high performance in HNNs, various synaptic arrays and neuron circuits suitable for efficient architectures and learning algorithms have been researched [4][5][6][7][8]. Specifically, both excitatory (G + ) and inhibitory (G -) synaptic arrays are important to improve the accuracy of HNNs [9][10][11]. Neuron circuits that use large capacitors (≥ 0.1 pF) and many transistors (≥ 11 MOSFETs) to process simultaneously signals from these two types of synapses have been reported [11][12][13], resulting in increased power consumption and a larger area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, both excitatory (G + ) and inhibitory (G -) synaptic arrays are important to improve the accuracy of HNNs [9][10][11]. Neuron circuits that use large capacitors (≥ 0.1 pF) and many transistors (≥ 11 MOSFETs) to process simultaneously signals from these two types of synapses have been reported [11][12][13], resulting in increased power consumption and a larger area. Note that processing these signals simultaneously can reduce memory usage and simplify the peripheral circuitry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current-mirror-based neurons [8], [9] and op-amp-based neurons [10], [11] are the two types of analog I&F neurons commonly used in hardware-based SNNs. The I&F neurons receive pre-synaptic spikes from the preceding layer and accumulate them as membrane potential in the voltage domain.…”
Section: Time-domain Neuron a Limitations Of Voltage-domain Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that when an input spike is modulated with a positive (negative) weight, the ICO frequency should increase (decrease). A straightforward way to implement this is to use a current mirror as [9], where PMOS/NMOS are used to add/subtract current flowing into the ICO, respectively. However, this implementation suffers from a mismatch between PMOS and NMOS, which manifests itself as weight error and leads to inference accuracy degradation.…”
Section: Low-power Design Of Time-domain Neuronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional I & F neuron circuits are vulnerable to off-currents continuously occurring in the synaptic array because the integration part passes the input synaptic current to the membrane capacitor without any control. To analyze the effect of the synaptic off-current on the neuron circuit, we can model the analog relationship between the current and based on previous work [34]. The of the conventional I & F neuron circuit at time t can be expressed as:…”
Section: A Conventional I and F Neuron Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%