2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01940-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Purpose To determine whether there was a significant impact on using cryopreservation of testicular or epididymal sperm upon the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During ICSI cycles using epididymal or testicular sperm, cryopreservation of retrieved sperm during diagnostic procedure for ICSI has shown to be valid option to avoid repeating puncture or biopsy. While earlier studies suggested that cycles using frozen-thawed retrieved sperm resulted in comparable pregnancy outcomes than those using fresh retrieved sperm [4,5], recent evidence suggested a lower pregnancy rate by using frozen epididymal/testicular sperm compared with fresh epididymal/testicular sperm [6,7], suggesting a potential effect of cryopreservation on injected sperm. Cryopreservation may lead to genetic and epigenetic changes in spermatozoa [8], which affect not only implantation of the transferred embryo but also neonatal outcomes of the offspring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…During ICSI cycles using epididymal or testicular sperm, cryopreservation of retrieved sperm during diagnostic procedure for ICSI has shown to be valid option to avoid repeating puncture or biopsy. While earlier studies suggested that cycles using frozen-thawed retrieved sperm resulted in comparable pregnancy outcomes than those using fresh retrieved sperm [4,5], recent evidence suggested a lower pregnancy rate by using frozen epididymal/testicular sperm compared with fresh epididymal/testicular sperm [6,7], suggesting a potential effect of cryopreservation on injected sperm. Cryopreservation may lead to genetic and epigenetic changes in spermatozoa [8], which affect not only implantation of the transferred embryo but also neonatal outcomes of the offspring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Firstly, the sample size was too small to divide subgroups for independent analysis of the use of fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa. However, no statistical differences were found in the fertilization and good quality embryo rates between the frozen-thawed immotile spermatozoa group and the routine fresh immotile spermatozoa ICSI group [35]. Larger samples are needed to compare the clinical outcomes of these two subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…High-quality blastocysts are usually able to achieve higher pregnancy and implantation rates, which are important indicators of the developmental potential of transferred embryos in vivo (24). With regard to the effect of sperm from different surgical sources on pregnancy outcomes in assisted reproduction, some authors (25,26) have concluded that there is no significant difference in the effect of testicular and epididymal sperm on clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates. The results of this study showed that the rate of high-quality blastocysts in the TESA group was 82.56%, which was significantly higher than that in the PESA group (71.82%).The higher rate of highquality blastocysts in the TESA group may be due to the fact that the sperm obtained by the TESA procedure were local fresh sperm from the testicular tissue, while the patients in the PESA group may have had a poor sperm storage microenvironment due to long vasal obstruction, resulting in The results of most domestic and international studies (27,28) showed no statistical difference in the fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate between TESA and PESA surgical sperm sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%