2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired time perception and motor timing in stimulant-dependent subjects

Abstract: Stimulant-dependent individuals (SDI) have abnormal brain metabolism and structural changes involving dopaminergic target areas important for the processing of time. These individuals are also more impulsive and impaired in working memory and attention. The current study tested whether SDI show altered temporal processing in relation to impulsivity or impaired prefrontal cortex functioning. We employed a series of timing tasks aimed to examine time processing from the milliseconds to multiple seconds range and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
152
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(74 reference statements)
4
152
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if an internal clock plays a role, it will complicate the putative relation between future time perspective and delay discounting. Wittmann, Leland, Churan, & Paulus (2007) reported that stimulant-dependent individuals, who in other studies exhibit steeper discounting functions and would have shorter predicted time horizons, estimated time intervals of 53 s as substantially longer than control participants, implying a faster running internal clock. In summary, although the association between delinquency and delay discounting is unclear, delinquency does appear to be associated with a shorter future time perspective.…”
Section: Risky Behaviormentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, if an internal clock plays a role, it will complicate the putative relation between future time perspective and delay discounting. Wittmann, Leland, Churan, & Paulus (2007) reported that stimulant-dependent individuals, who in other studies exhibit steeper discounting functions and would have shorter predicted time horizons, estimated time intervals of 53 s as substantially longer than control participants, implying a faster running internal clock. In summary, although the association between delinquency and delay discounting is unclear, delinquency does appear to be associated with a shorter future time perspective.…”
Section: Risky Behaviormentioning
confidence: 87%
“…First, many studies in this area (mental distress and time estimation and specifically anxiety and time estimation) have used between-group designs, either based on existing groups or on cut-off scores. A between-group design thus facilitates comparisons with these studies [3,7,21,[26][27][28]. Second, the groups were divided on the basis of clinical levels versus non-clinical levels of anxiety, which further motivates the use of a between-group analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean ratios were calculated for all the time estimation tasks by dividing the estimated duration in every condition by the actual duration of the same condition. In this procedure, a value <1 indicates underestimation and a value >1 indicates overestimation of the time interval [28]. There was one missing value in the S-ZTPI data and it was replaced using the multiple imputation function in SPSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, many commonly prescribed drugs powerfully modulate dopaminergic signaling. Thus, understanding the precise mechanism of dopaminergic control of emotion and clock speed is of great clinical relevance, as it may help provide insight into symptoms of Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and ADHD, as well as help develop and tune current and novel therapies and genetic tests for these and other human diseases including drug abuse, anxiety, and depression (e.g., Bartholomew et al, 2015;Howland, 2012;Lake, 2016;Lake et al, in press;Meck, 2005;Schapira et al, 2006;Thönes & Oberfeld, 2015;Tomasi et al, 2015;Wittmann et al, 2007).…”
Section: Clinical Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%