2018
DOI: 10.1108/he-04-2017-0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation fidelity of a voluntary sector-led diabetes education programme

Abstract: Purpose: The quality of voluntary sector-led community health programmes is an important concern for service users, providers and commissioners. Research on the fidelity of programme implementation offers a basis for assessing and further enhancing practice. This paper reports on the fidelity assessment of Living Well, Taking Control (LWTC) -a voluntary sector-led, community-based education programme in England focusing on the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes.Design/methodology/approach: This fidel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of weight loss observed was similar to the 1.6 to 2.5 kg reported in reviews of randomised controlled trials of real-world diabetes prevention interventions [15] and previous UK-based diabetes prevention studies [16, 17], though less than the 3-4 kg that might be expected for programmes fully implementing NICE guidance on the content of diabetes prevention interventions [15]. Reasons for this may include lower than planned contact time (data on contacts outside core group sessions were not consistently recorded), or variations from planned delivery (fidelity was checked only in a sub-sample at one site [28]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitude of weight loss observed was similar to the 1.6 to 2.5 kg reported in reviews of randomised controlled trials of real-world diabetes prevention interventions [15] and previous UK-based diabetes prevention studies [16, 17], though less than the 3-4 kg that might be expected for programmes fully implementing NICE guidance on the content of diabetes prevention interventions [15]. Reasons for this may include lower than planned contact time (data on contacts outside core group sessions were not consistently recorded), or variations from planned delivery (fidelity was checked only in a sub-sample at one site [28]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…staff were trained in using person-centred counselling techniques to build empathy and assess and enhance motivation with a focus on building the perceived importance of, and confidence in, making changes) reflected all 11 NICE recommendations for diabetes prevention interventions [3]. Fidelity of implementation was checked at one site, and as reported elsewhere [28], found to be high. Participant satisfaction with the programme is also reported elsewhere [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many frameworks have been developed for assessing IF. Where applicable, some studies combine adherence and competence to assess IF [38,44,45] while other studies assessed only…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: the Conceptual Framework For Implementation Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted on IF from different disciplines [33]; in education [34], social work [35], engineering [36], construction [37] and health [16,38,39], the area of this study. IF is important in the process of translating evidence-based interventions into real-life practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evidence-based programs, implementation fidelity is a determinant for successful interventions. 9,10 Although a high degree of program fidelity could generate better results, many implementations stray from fidelity guidelines. 11 Programs might be expanded or truncated to fit into allotted class time or spread over a longer period of time (ie, several weeks) than intended.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%