Implementation of Local Management Information System (SIMDA) in Quality Improvement of Financial Report of Buol Regencial Government

Abstract

This case study is an analysis of a covert pro-paedophilia organisation operating as a Child Protection Charity. The organisation known as Prostasia claims to adopt an alternative approach to the combating of child sexual abuse. Analysis of their website, video content, points of advocacy, lack of transparency and organisational structure as well as specific and general semantic messaging prove this is not true. The semantics adopted by Prostasia’s language forms to foster a pro-paedophilia message as a victim-oppressor narrative that identifies paedophiles as victims of an oppressive social structure (society in general) that attaches an unfair stigma to paedophiles. It also promotes paedophilia as a legitimate and innate form of human sexuality. An analysis will explain how the organisation uses propaganda and physiological aversion techniques to link itself with an underdog position of historic struggles and that paints critics in the colours of radicals of extreme or alt-right persuasions. The organisation seeks to normalize child sexual abuse materials as a form of “therapy” and that they do not support “conversion therapy” thereby using the “affirming” approach. Analysis provides an insight into how the organisation seeks to augment semantics by transmutation of terminologies such as “paedophile” into “minor attracted person” as a strategy that seeks to soften public opinion on deviancy. A comparison of Prostasia and B4U Act is made. It discusses, in addition, how areas in academia and certain “academics” act as enablers and as mouthpieces for paedophilia related propaganda.