Implementation of technology innovation in MSMEs in India

Abstract

Purpose In the present age of globalization, micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) are consistently causative to productivity growth and, consequently, competitiveness and aggregate economic growth by providing the training opportunities, basic services and are believed to be especially effective job creators and enjoy the reputation of being sources of income. But technological progressions have increased greatly, the competition impelled by the globalization of the world economies and even MSMEs are no more protected to the challenges that the globalization brings about. It is a remarkable, and in certain instances, a worrying situation because MSMEs play an important role in most economies, including in India, in that they comprise the largest business block and offer the bulk of employment. The purpose of this paper is to assess the status of problems faced by MSMEs and study the technology innovation implementation (TII) dimensions in the selected small firms in the Northern region in India. Design/methodology/approach The methodology used for this study is a combination of literature review, expert opinion, comparative case study and a flexible systems methodology, SWOT and situation-actor-process-learning-action-performance analysis. Longitudinal studies of technology innovation at the two small firms have been conducted, and the case analysis and synthesis have been developed based on important inputs and insights shared by key personnel in the select firms. Findings The study finds that two different firms have faced similar kind of challenges in this competitive environment. Also the findings suggest that an effective TII can contribute to enhance manufacturing performance in MSMEs in India. Originality/value The research presents a better understanding of the problems that are preventing the successful implementation of technology innovation in small firms. Further, the two cases provide valuable insights into TII dimensions in two firms and highlight the methodology to be adopted by the companies toward their manufacturing performance enhancement.

Toward SME digital transformation in the supply chain context: the role of structural social and human capital

“…Specifically, our research shows that TA positively affects SMEs' BPG (0.336). This finding supports the inference of Singh (2019) and Vo-Thanh et al (2022) and our arguments that SMEs need to adopt appropriate technologies as one essential strategy to improve their performance in the growing DT trend. Our results also increase the generalizability of the outcome of prior studies about the role of several specific technologies.…”

Determinants of intention to adopt big data and outsourcing among SMEs: organisational and technological factors as moderators

“…2.1 Big data analytics and SMEs SMEs are a powerful economic engine in today's marketplace, specifically in emerging markets, and serve as the critical factor of success and continued growth of national economies through productivity, innovation, and creating job opportunities (Safari and Saleh, 2020). Additionally, the implementation of new technology can be one of the key strategies within SMEs for improving their market position and making them more productive and innovative (Singh, 2019;Yusof et al, 2014). Nowadays, BDA has a significant influence in various fields such as online commerce, public service and e-government, science and manufacturing, security, and public safety (Elia et al, 2020).…”

A study of performance measures and quality management system in small and medium enterprises in India

“…SMEs are facing new challenges due to the more dynamic environment, and some are threatened with closure (T€ ul€ uce and Do gan, 2014). Several studies in the Indian context delved on the issues and challenges faced by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the country (Khurana et al, 2019;Ravikumar, 2013;Singh, 2019;Singh and Wasdani, 2016;Srinivasan and Kunjangad, 2019;Srinivasan and Lohith, 2017). They have mentioned the need for better technology, sustainability, innovation and funds; however, reference to a quality management system (QMS) was mostly scarce.…”