Implementation of the World’s largest measles-rubella mass vaccination campaign in Bangladesh: a process evaluation

Abstract

Background Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, supported a mass vaccination Measles-Rubella Campaign (MRC) in Bangladesh during January–February 2014. Methods We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation to understand the successes and challenges in implementation of the MRC. We reviewed documents for the MRC and the immunization programme in Bangladesh; observed meetings, vaccination sessions, and health facilities; and conducted 58 key informant interviews, 574 exit interviews with caregivers and 156 brief surveys with stakeholders involved in immunization. Our theory of Change for vaccination delivery guided our assessment of ideal implementation milestones and indicators to compare with the actual implementation processes. Results We identified challenges relating to country-wide political unrest, administrative and budgetary delays, shortage of transportation, problems in registration of target populations, and fears about safety of the vaccine. Despite these issues, a number of elements contributed to the successful launch of the MRC. These included: the comprehensive design of the campaign; strong partnerships between immunization authorities in the government system, Alliance partners, and civil society actors; and motivated and skilled health workers at different levels of the health system. Conclusions The successful implementation of the MRC in spite of numerous contextual and operational challenges demonstrated the adaptive capacity of the national immunization programme and its partners that has positive implications for future introductions of Gavi-supported vaccines.

Changing trends in measles vaccination status between 2004 and 2014 among children aged 12–23 months in Bangladesh

“…In 1999, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and United Nation (UN) agencies prioritised low‐income and the poorest countries of the world to address their high childhood disease burden through immunisation services . Hence, they paid more attention to expanding coverage to prevent morbidity, disability and mortality from vaccine‐preventable infectious diseases . However, for several years, global coverage with measles vaccine has held up at 85%.…”

Use of concurrent evaluation to improve implementation of a home fortification programme in Bangladesh: a methodological innovation

“…Concurrent evaluation considers both process and outcome indicators, as well as the overall assessment of programme effectiveness (17) . Whereas, process evaluation designs to assess process indicators generally (18) . The overall aim of process evaluation was to assist implementers of the home fortification programme to attain a clear understanding of whether the intervention was being implemented as planned or not, and to provide the opportunity to refine the implementation strategy and action plans prior to measuring the outcome and impact of the intervention.…”

The elimination of measles in Iran

“…Similar mass catch-up measles immunisation campaigns have been done in countries around the world, but in smaller populations or with a lower vaccination coverage. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Much like the Pan American Health Organization's measles elimination vaccination strategy, Iran's national campaign consisted of three phases. 8 The first phase, also known as the catch-up phase, began on Dec 6, 2003, and was targeted at those aged from 5 years to 25 years.…”