2008 IEEE Symposium on Advanced Management of Information for Globalized Enterprises (AMIGE) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/amige.2008.ecp.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Best Practices in ERP for Small & Medium Enterprises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best practices for ERP implementation in SMEs are investigated by using a problem driven approach by dividing implementation process into several components which will reflect the nature of ERP projects and makes them distinctive from other systems design. Methods critical issues relating to developing entrepreneurship for sustainable development of SMEs for its future extensions and added benefits are also addressed [7] The challenges in global ERP software implementation is studied .the challenges in implementation are identified as non uniform business practices in different countries, conflict of interests between various stake holders, Lack of experienced implementers in all countries, efficient uses of metanational advantages,. From this study it has been found that the benefits of ERP implementation are not same for all functions [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best practices for ERP implementation in SMEs are investigated by using a problem driven approach by dividing implementation process into several components which will reflect the nature of ERP projects and makes them distinctive from other systems design. Methods critical issues relating to developing entrepreneurship for sustainable development of SMEs for its future extensions and added benefits are also addressed [7] The challenges in global ERP software implementation is studied .the challenges in implementation are identified as non uniform business practices in different countries, conflict of interests between various stake holders, Lack of experienced implementers in all countries, efficient uses of metanational advantages,. From this study it has been found that the benefits of ERP implementation are not same for all functions [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seethamraju, 2015;Shahawai & Idrus, 2011;Winkelmann & Klose, 2008); the complexity of the these systems (Equey & Fragnière, 2008); its fit and customization in the enterprise (Deltour, 2012;Equey & Fragnière, 2008;Ghobakhloo, Hong, Sabouri, & Zulkifli, 2012;E. Hustad & Olsen, 2011;Shaul & Tauber, 2012) and, poor data quality and security (Jha, Hoda, & Saini, 2008;Sahran, Goni, & Mukhtar, 2010;Shaul & Tauber, 2012).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seethamraju, 2008;Serrano et al, 2010;Sia, 2008Sia, , 2008Sumner & Bradley, 2009;Wang, Wang, & King, 2003); low levels of management (projects, change, risk) (Deltour, 2012;Equey & Fragnière, 2008;R. Seethamraju, 2008); the selection de software package and implantation are difficult (Eli Hustad & Olsen, 2013;Jha et al, 2008;Winkelmann & Klose, 2008); finally have neglected social aspects such as…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations