Fish Reproductive Biology 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9781444312133.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Information on Stock Reproductive Potential in Fisheries Management: The Motivation, Challenges and Opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the stock structure within a population (e.g. Marshall, 2009;Marshall et al, 2006), and accordingly varies between years (e.g. Kennedy et al, 2007;Kjesbu et al, 1998;Ndjaula et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the stock structure within a population (e.g. Marshall, 2009;Marshall et al, 2006), and accordingly varies between years (e.g. Kennedy et al, 2007;Kjesbu et al, 1998;Ndjaula et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSB is a gross estimate of reproductive potential that does not reflect changes in energy allocation or reproductive behavior that affect egg production (Marshall 2009). More importantly, estimates of SSB and R combine measurement and process error that are not taken into consideration in my analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S6). The truncated age distributions commonly seen in heavily fished populations are known to negatively affect parental quality (47) and thereby recruitment success (48). If this holds true for the BS cod, positive changes in recruitment should become apparent in the near future as a consequence of the higher stock-age diversity (49).…”
Section: Temperature-driven Range Expansions and Bs Cod Population Sizementioning
confidence: 99%