Implementing Systematic Patient-Reported Measures for Chronic Conditions Through the Naveta Value-Based Telemedicine Initiative: Observational Retrospective Multicenter Study (Preprint)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome and experience measures can play a critical role in providing patient-centered and value-based healthcare to a growing population of chronically ill patients. Value-based telemedicine platforms such as the Naveta initiative may facilitate the effective integration of these tools into healthcare systems. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the response rate to electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) and electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) among patients participating in the Naveta telemedicine initiative, its correlations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the evolution of the rates over time. METHODS Between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023, a total of 53,364 ePREMs and ePROMs for 20 chronic conditions were administered through the Naveta-Phemium platform. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize continuous and categorical variables. Differences in response rates within each sociodemographic variable were analyzed using logistic regression models, with significance assessed via the chi-square and post-hoc Tukey tests. Two-way ANOVA was used to examine the interaction between time interval and disease type on response rate evolution. RESULTS A total of 3,372 patients with severe chronic diseases from 64 public hospitals in Spain participated in the Naveta health questionnaire project. The overall response rate to ePROMs and ePREMs during the first 2.5 years of the Naveta initiative was 46.12%, with a baseline rate of 53.33%. Several sociodemographic factors correlated with lower response rates, including male gender, older age, lower education level, frequent alcohol use, being a student, and not being physically active. There were also significant variations in response rates among different types of chronic conditions, with the highest rates for respiratory (71.45%), oncologic (62.70%), digestive (62.40%), and rheumatic diseases (57.82%), and the lowest for HIV+ patients (32.93%). During the first 6 months of follow-up, response rates decreased in all disease types, except for the oncology group, which increased up to 100%. Subsequently, the overall response rate approached baseline levels. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of routine ePROM and ePREM collection in clinical settings requires the integration of electronic questionnaire administration systems. Recognizing the influence of sociodemographic factors on response rates is critical to identifying barriers to participation in telemonitoring programs and ensuring inclusiveness in patient-centered healthcare practices. The observed decline in response rates at follow-up may be due to survey fatigue, highlighting the need for strategies to mitigate this effect. In addition, the variation in response rates across chronic conditions emphasizes the importance of tailoring telemonitoring approaches to specific patient populations.