1994
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<1915:iothao>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of the Hydrostatic Assumption on Atmospheric Gravity Waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper limit of the IFS is formally always at p = 0, whereas a rigid lid upper boundary at 25 km was chosen in EULAG for computational efficiency. While in the non-hydrostatic IFS no absorbers are used, in EULAG the damping profile α = τ −1 max{0, (Z − Z thres )/(Z top − Z thres )} is applied with Z thres = 20 km and τ = 300 s. non-hydrostatic solutions may be compared with the solution obtained with the hydrostatic IFS (Figure 2), which is consistent with the analytic solution (maximum contours 0.6 m s −1 ) of the same case presented in Keller (1994). The hydrostatic model fails to represent the trapping and the horizontal propagation of lee waves.…”
Section: Quasi-two-dimensional Orographic Flow With Linear Vertical Ssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The upper limit of the IFS is formally always at p = 0, whereas a rigid lid upper boundary at 25 km was chosen in EULAG for computational efficiency. While in the non-hydrostatic IFS no absorbers are used, in EULAG the damping profile α = τ −1 max{0, (Z − Z thres )/(Z top − Z thres )} is applied with Z thres = 20 km and τ = 300 s. non-hydrostatic solutions may be compared with the solution obtained with the hydrostatic IFS (Figure 2), which is consistent with the analytic solution (maximum contours 0.6 m s −1 ) of the same case presented in Keller (1994). The hydrostatic model fails to represent the trapping and the horizontal propagation of lee waves.…”
Section: Quasi-two-dimensional Orographic Flow With Linear Vertical Ssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This classical problem -studied in Wurtele et al (1987) and Keller (1994) -constitutes a particularly discriminating test, because in the presence of shear the non-hydrostatic and hydrostatic equations predict a fundamentally different propagation of orographically forced gravity waves. While hydrostatic models produce a vertically propagating mountain gravity wave, the correct solution is that of a trapped, horizontally propagating gravity wave.…”
Section: Quasi-two-dimensional Orographic Flow With Linear Vertical Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model successfully passed a large variety of idealized test cases, such as vertical-plane 2D simulations of orographic flows, including trapped lee waves (Keller, 1994), bubble convection cases at decametric scales (Robert, 1993) and 3D flows with and without Earth rotation over idealized and real orography, at various scales. During these tests, the model constantly showed its ability to perform stable integrations with typical CFL numbers up to 10 at kilometric resolutions, thus indicating a reasonable appropriateness for further NWP use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%