2010
DOI: 10.1556/ageod.45.2010.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved geophysical image of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A scenario, where all SKS splitting is produced in the lithosphere, would only be possible if the foliation in the lithospheric mantle was vertical and the LAB was at ~125‐km depth beneath the NGVF (case 2 with crustal contribution included). Although such LAB depths have been proposed as maximum values (Bielik et al, ), it may be shallower than this (Tašárová et al, ). Moreover, absence of an asthenospheric contribution to seismic anisotropy is not a plausible hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scenario, where all SKS splitting is produced in the lithosphere, would only be possible if the foliation in the lithospheric mantle was vertical and the LAB was at ~125‐km depth beneath the NGVF (case 2 with crustal contribution included). Although such LAB depths have been proposed as maximum values (Bielik et al, ), it may be shallower than this (Tašárová et al, ). Moreover, absence of an asthenospheric contribution to seismic anisotropy is not a plausible hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models calculated in a steady state regime were made by Bielik et al (1991), Majcin (1993) and others. The results of the geophysical integrated modelling approaches applied within the studied region were presented in Dérerová et al (2006), Bielik et al (2010), Hlavňová et al (2015). Moreover the transient 2D models along the profiles crossing the Carpathian arc and main local structures (Kutas et al, 1989;Majcin and Tsvyashchenko, 1994;Tarasov et al, 2005;Majcin et al, 2014 andKutas, 2014) deal with the recent tectono-thermal history of the region.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed the starting geothermal models using these methods. Similarly to the paper (Majcin et al, 2016) these models were supplemented by existing results of the geothermal modelling made for the studied region both for steady state (Čermák and Bodri, 1986;Bielik et al, 1991;Majcin, 1993) and transient thermal regimes (Kutas et al, 1989;Majcin and Tsvyashchenko, 1994;Majcin et al, 1998;Tarasov et al, 2005;Majcin et al, 2014;Kutas, 2014;Majcin et al, 2015) approaches and by so-called integrated modelling approaches (Zeyen et al, 2002;Dérerová et al, 2006Dérerová et al, , 2012Dérerová et al, , 2014Bielik et al, 2010;Grinč et al, 2014;Hlavňová et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%