2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2020.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved prediction model for H2/CO combustion risk using a calculated non-adiabatic flame temperature model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative errors between the simulated and experimental values for the flame temperature and radiation intensity were 16.94% and 9.54%, respectively. These errors meet the requirements of industrial applications [20], thus confirming the feasibility and accuracy of the simulation method. In order to simulate different operating conditions, five sets of experiments were designed with methane volumetric flow rates of 0.4 m 3 /h, 1.2 m 3 /h, 2.0 m 3 /h, 2.8 m 3 /h, and 3.6 m 3 /h as Table 1 shows.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The relative errors between the simulated and experimental values for the flame temperature and radiation intensity were 16.94% and 9.54%, respectively. These errors meet the requirements of industrial applications [20], thus confirming the feasibility and accuracy of the simulation method. In order to simulate different operating conditions, five sets of experiments were designed with methane volumetric flow rates of 0.4 m 3 /h, 1.2 m 3 /h, 2.0 m 3 /h, 2.8 m 3 /h, and 3.6 m 3 /h as Table 1 shows.…”
Section: Model Verificationsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…They also confirmed that the CFT model predicts the lower flammability limit of steam-containing hydrogen mixtures from the thermal emissivity near the limit. Kim et al proposed an improved prediction model for the combustion hazard of hydrogen/carbon monoxide using a computational flame temperature model considering heat loss. They also confirmed that the CFT model predicts the lower flammability limit of steam-containing hydrogen mixtures from the thermal emissivity near the limit …”
Section: Advances In the Prediction Model Of Flammability Limits Of C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c is the coefficient obtained from the experimental measurement, c = 0.0854. Catoire et al 196 proposed an equation for estimating the lower flammability limit of pure combustible gases in the 25− Table 5 58 Babrauskas, 155 Bodurtha, 156 and Vanderstraeten et al 82 instead of relying on the theory of combustible ignition, flame propagation, and flame extinction, they both build black box models by fitting experimental data heat balance theory CAFT method Benedetto, 157 Mashuga et al, 158 Shebeko et al, 159 Rowley et al, 160 Vidal et al, 161,162 Qin et al, 163 Chen et al, 164,165 Shu et al, 166,167 Li et al, 168 Hu et al, 169 Palucis et al, 170 Wu et al, 171 Bounaceur et al, 172 Wan et al, 173−176 and Mendiburu et al 177−180 this method is unsuitable for estimating the upper limits of flammability because it is difficult to calculate the heat capacity of unburned fuel precisely CFT method Zhao et al, 181 Liaw et al, 182 Kim et al, 30 and Jeon et al 31 flame propagation and heat dissipation theory burn rate method Law et al, 183 Wang et al, 184 where X is the mole fraction of fuel in the corresponding stoichiometric fuel/air mixture, n is the number of carbon atoms in the molecule, and T is the temperature (K).…”
Section: Advances In the Prediction Model Of Flammability Limits Of C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prediction shows lower accuracy and conservative results, especially for specific mixtures. 18 The application of the flame temperature, which is equivalent to such a minimum temperature, in the energy balance explains the flammability limits. 19 To further understand the LFLs of fuel mixtures, this paper tested the lower explosion limit of the ternary mixtures of methane-ethylene-propane and compared it with the prediction of the empirical formula of Le Chatelier's law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%