1975
DOI: 10.6028/nbs.ir.75-685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved ultrasonic standard reference blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least 9 data runs were also made on the No. 3 and No. 8 reference block sets owned by NBS using the same measurement system.…”
Section: Effects Of the Ultrasonic Measurement Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 9 data runs were also made on the No. 3 and No. 8 reference block sets owned by NBS using the same measurement system.…”
Section: Effects Of the Ultrasonic Measurement Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were particularly encouraging, While it is not presumed that such standards would replace the field-use reference blocks, two-piece quartz blocks may be of value as master or primary transfer standards used for equipment standardization and interlaboratory measurement system comparisons. Figure 30 of [8]. The scatter between these data appears to be no worse than the scatter between data from different sets of blocks of the same size (Figures 3 to 22).…”
Section: Single Materials Standaramentioning
confidence: 84%
“…20, [8]) showed evidence of four-fold symmetry which was probably retained from the early fabrication of the rolled rod. The same uniformity in texture as found in extruded rod is not to be expected in swaged or rolled rod.…”
Section: Metallurgical Cooalhpriiunnhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extreme example of material variability was reported in a particular No. 5 hole block set [7]. Figure 3 compares the results on that anomalous set with typical data for acceptable blocks (solid line).…”
Section: Block Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The resultant one dB variation (from minimum to maximum pulse width) in the spherical target echo demonstrates a difference in sensitivity to the two targets which clearly is not desirable in block calibration. Results like these have led to the conclusion that the flat-bottom-hole provides a better primary reference standard for purposes of block calibration than does the steel sphere [4,7]. With regard to the third approach, various attempts to achieve reproducible results by substituting an electronic source for the echo signal have not been very successful.…”
Section: Primary Reference Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%