Improving Data Governance and Personal Data Protection through ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025

Nasution, Sri Wahyuni

doi:10.35497/353777

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It enforces rules in four Southeast Asian countries that have digital protection for personal data: Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Other countries, like Indonesia and Vietnam, do not have this yet (Nasution, 2021). The regulations implemented by the four countries provide actual protection and verification of data in government transactions with its citizens and with other countries.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries

Sukarno

Nurmandi

2023

jcgpp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aims of this study is to find out how the E-Government Development Index (EGDI) affects the World Governance Index (WGI) in Southeast Asia. The choice of a Southeast Asian country is important because, in general, Southeast Asia is a developing country that needs improvement, especially in the area of government. Southeast Asian countries still have governance that hasn't worked well as a whole, and non-government actors still have the most power. The method used in the research is quantitative machine learning (Google Collab Research) analysis. Data processing is carried out in the form of extras from EGDI and WGI in Southeast Asian countries to find the influence of the two data sets. The results showed that the impact of EGDI on WGI was the greatest in the indicators of government effectiveness and regulatory quality, with a score above 0.53. The reason behind this is the increase in digital bureaucracy in all sectors of government; it also has an impact on good governance. Then, in the sector of corruption control, some countries have also adopted ICT, and some of them have succeeded in reducing corruption. Sectors that have adopted digital bureaucracies, such as education, environment, crisis management, and sustainable development. In the regulatory quality sector, institutional improvements are carried out to suppress corruption and improve the quality of democracy by involving non-governmental actors. The lowest indicator is voice and accountability, with a score below 0.49 (moderate). This is because there is still a lot of development in terms of governance and government institutions, which have not run optimally.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries

Sukarno

Nurmandi

2023

jcgpp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…PDPA in the Philippines and Thailand covers both the public and private sector, whereas PDPA in Singapore and Malaysia is only for data collection and data use in private sector. It is interesting to note that for countries with PDPA, it is only Malaysia that does not require notification to the data owner in the event of a data breach [61]. Meanwhile, only the Philippines has established a specific independent data protection authority, that is National Privacy Commission (NPC), while Singapore and Malaysia have data protection agencies housed under a government agency.…”

Section: Malaysia's Progress In Iot: Data Security and Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…There have not been significant efforts to develop comprehensive data protection law in Myanmar, Cambodia, Brunei, and Lao PDR. Source: Information compiled and analysed based on Improving Data Governance and Personal Data Protection through ASEAN Digital Master Plan 2025[61].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Protecting the Unprotected Consumer Data in Internet of Things: Current Scenario of Data Governance in Malaysia

Cheryl

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the increasing number of smart devices and connections in Internet of Things (IoT) comes risks—specifically involving consumer data protection. In this respect, this exploratory research examines the current issues of IoT and personal data protection in Malaysia that includes: regulatory frameworks and data governance; issues and gaps; and key challenges in implementation. Results from this mixed-methods research indicates that a majority of consumers expressed concern about personal data risks due to increased usage of IoT devices. Moreover, there is a crucial need to increase regulation and accountability in the industry. In this regard, collaboration and partnerships between the main stakeholders are essential in tackling emerging issues of IoT and personal data protection. In order to strengthen IoT data governance, the fundamentals should be: strengthening consumer education and smart partnership between government-industry-civil society; providing motivation for active participation of NGOs and civil society; and obtaining industry buy-in. This paper also proposes a structure for the governance of evolving data-related technology, particularly in the case of data breaches or cyber incidents. It adds to the wider discussion of the current scenario, and proposes a model of collective responsibility in IoT data governance that is underpinned by the three principles of fair information practices, privacy impact assessment and privacy accountability.

show abstract

Improving Data Governance and Personal Data Protection through ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries

E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries

Protecting the Unprotected Consumer Data in Internet of Things: Current Scenario of Data Governance in Malaysia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About