2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-015-0763-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving mass transfer in an inclined tubular photobioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table compares the k L a values obtained in this work with those reported in the literature for different configurations of PBRs. The value of k L a obtained for the PBR‐C in the biphasic system is 1.5 and 2.7 times higher than that of an airlift FP‐PBR reported by J. H. Dulce et al and a tubular PBR reported by Babcock et al . Furthermore, k L a values of PBR‐C are lower than that of different PBRs reported by N. Agathos et al,Siegel et al, and Contreras et al The superficial gas velocities used in these literatures were much higher than those in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table compares the k L a values obtained in this work with those reported in the literature for different configurations of PBRs. The value of k L a obtained for the PBR‐C in the biphasic system is 1.5 and 2.7 times higher than that of an airlift FP‐PBR reported by J. H. Dulce et al and a tubular PBR reported by Babcock et al . Furthermore, k L a values of PBR‐C are lower than that of different PBRs reported by N. Agathos et al,Siegel et al, and Contreras et al The superficial gas velocities used in these literatures were much higher than those in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In addition, the liquid phase mass transfer coefficient of the ladder‐type Mixer C is slightly lower than that of Mixer A but significantly higher than that of Mixer B and No Mixer. Table compares the k L a values obtained in this work with those reported in the literature for different configurations of PBRs. The value of k L a obtained for the PBR‐C in the biphasic system is 1.5 and 2.7 times higher than that of an airlift FP‐PBR reported by J. H. Dulce et al and a tubular PBR reported by Babcock et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Turbulent flow facilitates mixing in the normal direction (which is particularly necessary for high concentrations of cells), while laminar flow saves energy and is gentler on the cells. In tube reactors, more (sometimes much more) than 400 W/m 3 is customary (Babcock et al 2002), while in plate reactors the lowest level is 50 W/m 3 (Sierra et al 2008). Both open ponds and, even more so, enclosed bioreactors thus need auxiliary power essentially for mixing, gassing and transport.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, la tasa de inyección y la transferencia eficiente del CO 2 al medio de cultivo junto con la temperatura y la intensidad de luz son los mayores factores que influyen en la asimilación fotosintética del carbono [23,24]. Al realizar cultivos solo con el CO 2 presente en el aire (0,036%v) se obtienen bajas productividades, por lo tanto la solución a este déficit es inyectar CO 2 , para obtener un buen crecimiento [25][26][27][28][29][30]. Los estudios realizados con diferentes microalgas, evidencian la eficiencia de captura de CO 2 , hasta del 80% a 99%, que pueden alcanzarse en condiciones óptimas y tiempos cortos de residencia del gas, pero puede variar según el estado fisiológico [31].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified