2011
DOI: 10.1021/ct200565u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving MM-GB/SA Scoring through the Application of the Variable Dielectric Model

Abstract: A variable dielectric model based on residue types for better description of protein-ligand electrostatics in MM-GBSA scoring is reported. The variable dielectric approach provides better correlation with binding data and reduces the score dynamic range, typically observed in the standard MM-GB/SA method. The latter supports the view that exaggerated enthalpic separation between weak and potent compounds due to the lack of shielding effects in the model is greatly responsible for the wide scoring spread.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the BRC-peptide binding cavity of RAD51 is relatively solvated, we chose to use a protein dielectric ε of 13; values of 4–20 are routinely used, often using mixed values (38,39). ΔG bind values obtained from Endpoint Methods, such as MM-PBSA or BEM, should be viewed as enhanced scoring functions, which have enhanced rank-ordering value, rather than as metrics of accurate absolute binding free energy (40).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the BRC-peptide binding cavity of RAD51 is relatively solvated, we chose to use a protein dielectric ε of 13; values of 4–20 are routinely used, often using mixed values (38,39). ΔG bind values obtained from Endpoint Methods, such as MM-PBSA or BEM, should be viewed as enhanced scoring functions, which have enhanced rank-ordering value, rather than as metrics of accurate absolute binding free energy (40).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Schneider et al have validated the HYDE scoring function through large-scale docking experiments, which resulted to successful prediction of the correct binding mode in 93% of complexes when checked with the Astex diverse set [ 98 ]. Alternatively, Ravindranathan et al have defined a physics based scoring function and more precisely, a variable dielectric model based on residue types for better description of protein–ligand electrostatics in MM-GBSA scoring, which results in a higher correlation with affinity data [ 99 ]. Certainly, while much progress has been made in delivering more accurate scoring functions, further improvements in this direction are desirable.…”
Section: Virtual Screening In Structure-based Drug Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ε in( ij ) =max{ ε in( i ) , ε in( j ) }. Detailed descriptions regarding this point can be found in references [30, 31]. The values of the internal dielectric constants listed in Table 2 were obtained from reference [32].…”
Section: Structures and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%