2013
DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Problem-based Learning in Creative Communities Through Effective Group Evaluation

Abstract: In this case study, we researched one cohort from the Center for Animation, a higher education teaching environment that has successfully fostered group creativity and learning outcomes through problem-based learning. Through live and videotaped observations of the interactions of this community over 18 months, in addition to focused interviews with nine key community leaders, we considered the evaluative culture and actions of this community, and how these evaluative practices improved their creative problem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sabal (2009a) agrees and offers a range of approaches to assessment, which aim to better identify individual contributions and relieve student fears of unfair recognition in this area. The area of assessment in screen production has been explored by several other scholars including Sergi (2007), who looks at peer assessment in screen production education, and West et al (2013), who report on the development of effective group-and self-evaluation skills in a cohort from an American Centre for Animation. However, assessment falls outside of the scope of our Curtiin University study, which seeks to test strategies for the development of interpersonal, communication and conflict resolution skills prior to the production process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sabal (2009a) agrees and offers a range of approaches to assessment, which aim to better identify individual contributions and relieve student fears of unfair recognition in this area. The area of assessment in screen production has been explored by several other scholars including Sergi (2007), who looks at peer assessment in screen production education, and West et al (2013), who report on the development of effective group-and self-evaluation skills in a cohort from an American Centre for Animation. However, assessment falls outside of the scope of our Curtiin University study, which seeks to test strategies for the development of interpersonal, communication and conflict resolution skills prior to the production process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feedback plays an important role in helping students learn and succeed by providing them with guidance on how to make improvements (Smith & Gorard, 2005;West, Williams, & Williams, 2013). Formative feedback is given while work is being completed, as opposed to summative feedback which is given upon completion of an assignment (Shute, 2008).…”
Section: Formative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, the English department at Cabrini College embarked on designing a writing program to meet the digital, creative, interdisciplinary, and collaborative needs of the 21 st century workforce (Chettiparamb, 2007;West, Williams, & Williams, 2013). Increasingly, "educators and the public alike emphasize the need to work effectively in groups, to solve problems in a variety of contexts, [and] to think critically and imaginatively" (Riordan, 2005, p. 3) while developing requisite professional and disciplinary skills.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBL asks writing instructors to be deliberate in their choice of pedagogy in a way that reflects, philosophically, a spirit of student-centered creative exploration. Studies have illustrated a higher level of creativity for students in PBL over traditional lecture models (West, Williams, & Williams, 2013). Creating a 21 st century literary magazine requires extensive space for imagination and design, and PBL offers this space (Cennamo et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation