Improving radiology information systems for inclusivity of transgender and gender‐diverse patients: what are the problems and what are the solutions? A systematic review

Abstract

IntroductionIn medical radiation science (MRS), radiology information systems (RISs) record patient information such as name, gender and birthdate. The purpose of RISs is to ensure the safety and well‐being of patients by recording patient data accurately. However, not all RISs appropriately capture gender, sex or other related information of transgender and gender‐diverse (TGD) patients, resulting in non‐inclusive and discriminatory care. This review synthesises the research surrounding the limitations of RISs preventing inclusivity and the features required to support inclusivity and improve health outcomes.MethodsStudies were retrieved from three electronic databases (Scopus, PubMed and Embase). A quality assessment was performed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence‐Based Practice Research and Non‐Research Evidence Appraisal Tools. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesise the included articles.ResultsEighteen articles were included based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. The pool of studies included in this review comprised primarily of non‐research evidence and reflected the infancy of this research field and the need for further empirical evidence. The key findings of this review emphasise how current systems do not record the patient's name and pronouns appropriately, conflate sex and gender and treat sex and gender as a binary concept.ConclusionFor current systems to facilitate inclusivity, they must implement more comprehensive information and data models incorporating sex and gender and be more flexible to accommodate the transient and fluid nature of gender. However, implementation of these recommendations is not without challenges. Additionally, further research focused on RISs is required to address the unique challenges MRS settings present to TGD patients.