2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-8048-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Supply Chain Agility to Reduce Enterprise Risk Based on QFD-MADM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TOPSIS comes second, being applied to rank customer requirements through the use of triangular fuzzy numbers [63,64], and as a robust approach integrated in other methodologies to improve the HoQ structure [58,59,[65][66][67][68][69][70]. The MCDM approach that follows the number of applications reported is DEMATEL, and it is mainly used to deal with contradictions between technical requirements HOWs [8,37,46,71,72], but also to rank customer requirements [68,70]. Using DEMATEL to compute the importance of the customer requirements, the interrelationships between these elements can be analyzed simultaneously.…”
Section: Mcdm Methodologies In Qfd Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TOPSIS comes second, being applied to rank customer requirements through the use of triangular fuzzy numbers [63,64], and as a robust approach integrated in other methodologies to improve the HoQ structure [58,59,[65][66][67][68][69][70]. The MCDM approach that follows the number of applications reported is DEMATEL, and it is mainly used to deal with contradictions between technical requirements HOWs [8,37,46,71,72], but also to rank customer requirements [68,70]. Using DEMATEL to compute the importance of the customer requirements, the interrelationships between these elements can be analyzed simultaneously.…”
Section: Mcdm Methodologies In Qfd Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer methodologies have also been used in QFD in recent case studies, including hesitant fuzzy linguistics [36,73,74], fuzzy DEMATEL [39,75], grey relational analysis (GRA) [37,42,46,47,76], interval-valued fuzzy numbers (IVFN) [65,77], fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) [37,39,40,46,47,49,75], complex proportion assessment method (COPRAS) [78], ordinal priority approach-combinative distance-based assessment (OPA-CODAS) [79], social network analysis (SNA) [80], multi-stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (M-SWARA) [81], entropy weight method (EWM) [38], double hierarchy hesitant linguistic term sets (DHHLTSs) [36], organísation, rangement et synthèse de données relarionnelles (ORESTE) [36], best-worst method-based [39,82], combined compromise solution (Co-CoSo) [43,70], Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) [83], fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) [84], proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (PHFLTSs) [85], cumulative prospect theory (CPT) [85], fuzzy measuring attractiveness by a categorically based evaluation technique (FMACBETH) [40], and fuzzy full consistency method (FUCOM) [35,86].…”
Section: Other Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation