2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab40a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Epoch of Reionization Power Spectrum Results from Murchison Widefield Array Season 1 Observations

Abstract: Measurements of 21 cm Epoch of Reionization (EoR) structure are subject to systematics originating from both the analysis and the observation conditions. Using 2013 data from the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), we show the importance of mitigating both sources of contamination. A direct comparison between results from Beardsley et al. and our updated analysis demonstrates new precision techniques, lowering analysis systematics by a factor of 2.8 in power. We then further lower systematics by excising observat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
138
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that redundant calibration can continue to play an important role in 21-cm cosmology analysis going forward. While the results from EoR0 suggest that with a good enough sky model for sky-based calibration, redundant calibration becomes ineffective, we note that the limits from Barry et al (2019b), Li et al (2019), and Trott et al (2020) are all still one to two orders of magnitude above any plausible EoR signal models. Therefore, all we can conclude is that the errors that can be mitigated by redundant calibration are not the dominant source of error in those works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings suggest that redundant calibration can continue to play an important role in 21-cm cosmology analysis going forward. While the results from EoR0 suggest that with a good enough sky model for sky-based calibration, redundant calibration becomes ineffective, we note that the limits from Barry et al (2019b), Li et al (2019), and Trott et al (2020) are all still one to two orders of magnitude above any plausible EoR signal models. Therefore, all we can conclude is that the errors that can be mitigated by redundant calibration are not the dominant source of error in those works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In general, when we do see consistent improvements, they are at levels of ∼10 3 to 10 4 mK 2 . Given the recent measurements of Barry et al (2019b), Li et al (2019), and Trott et al (2020), which use the MWA to achieve lowest limits of 2 < 3.9 × 10 3 mK 2 , 2 < 2.39 × 10 3 mK 2 , and 2 < 1.8 × 10 3 mK 2 , respectively, we can see improvements of this scale can be significant.…”
Section: Comparison Of Power Spectramentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This work comes after the publication of MWA EoR upper limits from 2013 Phase I EoR0 high-band data (Beardsley et al 2016;Barry et al 2019b) and 2016 Phase II EoR0 high-band data (Li et al 2019). Those works focussed on improved calibration and data analysis strategies to produce excellent results at low redshift.…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Identification and flagging of low-level RFI in datasets (Wilensky et al 2019), as shown in Barry et al (2019b) to yield improved results;…”
Section: Discussion and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation