2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-021-06432-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Mechanical Properties and Wear Resistance of a Commercial Pearlitic Rail Steel Using a Two-Step Heat Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tensile and impact properties listed in Table 1 was tested base on TB/T 2344-2020 at ambient temperature (25 • C). The specimens for impact (10 × 10 × 55 mm 3 ) and dilatometer (Φ4 × 10 mm 2 ) tests were sampled within 15 mm from rail head tread, located within the hardened layer (~30 mm) of rail head.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tensile and impact properties listed in Table 1 was tested base on TB/T 2344-2020 at ambient temperature (25 • C). The specimens for impact (10 × 10 × 55 mm 3 ) and dilatometer (Φ4 × 10 mm 2 ) tests were sampled within 15 mm from rail head tread, located within the hardened layer (~30 mm) of rail head.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the rail materials are mainly eutectoid and hypereutectoid steels consisting of a dominant pearlitic structure. With the aid of microalloying [1], heat treatment [2,3] and thermal mechanical control processing (TMCP) technology [4], the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of premium pearlitic rail has exceeded 1450 MPa [5]. Nonetheless, for the pearlitic rails it is significantly difficult to further improve the service performance to meet the harsh conditions by means of the methods above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A temperatura inicial da transformação martensítica (Ms) para o ensaio dilatométrico com uma taxa de aquecimento de 10 °C/s mostrou uma temperatura de 198 °C. Os resultados observados por Masoumi et al[166] apresentaram resultados próximos a Ms de 196 °C. O modelo empírico de Kunitake[156] foi o mais relativo ao valor observado, mas com uma diferença de aproximadamente 5%.…”
unclassified