2014
DOI: 10.4141/cjas2013-192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the prediction of methane production and representation of rumen fermentation for finishing beef cattle within a mechanistic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy illustrates that other mechanisms must override the effect of an increased starch inflow on rumen starch digestion, with turnover or outflow rate of rumen contents as the most likely candidate. The same was suggested by the findings of Ellis et al (2014) for representing the digestion of low-roughage diets in beef cattle. Also in contrast, Kreikemeier et al (1990) observed an increased in situ fractional rate of starch degradation with increased roughage in a wheat-based finishing steer diet, in spite of a reduced starch intake, a lower rumen starch pool, and a higher fractional outflow rate of labeled starch.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancy illustrates that other mechanisms must override the effect of an increased starch inflow on rumen starch digestion, with turnover or outflow rate of rumen contents as the most likely candidate. The same was suggested by the findings of Ellis et al (2014) for representing the digestion of low-roughage diets in beef cattle. Also in contrast, Kreikemeier et al (1990) observed an increased in situ fractional rate of starch degradation with increased roughage in a wheat-based finishing steer diet, in spite of a reduced starch intake, a lower rumen starch pool, and a higher fractional outflow rate of labeled starch.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Predictive power for propionate and butyrate differed strongly among the alternative representations of VFA stoichiometry, and linear relationships between rumen pH and VFA production did not appear to improve prediction of VFA profile. Another evaluation study of enteric CH 4 in beef cattle by Ellis et al (2014) confirmed that inclusion of linear pH-dependency in VFA stoichiometry worsened CH 4 predictions (reflecting VFA profile) whereas non-linear dependency did not. The calculations on the VFA stoichiometry of Nozière et al (2011) were not available to Morvay et al (2011), but were used in a follow-up evaluation study on lactating cow data by Alemu et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RMSPE varied between 12.0% and 15.0% between different versions of the model with random error contributing from 27% to 91% of the total error. Recently, Ellis et al (2014) compared different VFA stoichiometry models in the modified version of the Dijkstra et al (1992) model with beef cattle data. The best model explained 52% of variation in total CH 4 emission with RMSPE as 29.8% of observed mean.…”
Section: Comparison To Mechanistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their analysis, the inclusion of the molecular breeding value of ribeye area increased by 13% the precision to predict body weight at 28% empty body fat. Despite the development of new concepts for nutrition modeling, revisions of relationships established a long time ago are still needed for three reasons: collection of new data and incorporation with old data (Ellis et al, 2014;Galyean and Tedeschi, 2014); data used to develop past relationships were deemed deficient and/or were based on assumptions that do not hold anymore (Galyean et al, 2016); or more advanced mathematical and/or statistical analyses have been proposed (Moraes et al, 2014a;Moraes et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Integrating Genomics Into Nutrition Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%