2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the Tracking and Removal of Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Abstract: Therapeutic and prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filters should be placed based on currently accepted indications to prevent a fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). The protective effect of filters is offset by the potential for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT), caval thrombosis, and possible otherwise unnecessary life-long anticoagulation (AC). The duration of treatment for most DVTs or PEs is 3 to 6 months of AC/filter. Filters should be retrieved when duration of treatment for a DVT/PE has been me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive follow-up program that tracks patients, assigns an individual dedicated to monitoring the program and educates physicians and patients is effective in minimizing loss to follow-up and improving retrieval rates. 61 …”
Section: Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive follow-up program that tracks patients, assigns an individual dedicated to monitoring the program and educates physicians and patients is effective in minimizing loss to follow-up and improving retrieval rates. 61 …”
Section: Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have described other schemes to improve the follow-up care for patients with retrievable devices. 48 Underlying the importance of expeditious retrievable filter tracking is the time-sensitive likelihood of removal. According to Angel et al, technically successful filter removal was achieved with the following rates: 99% at 1 month after placement, 94% at 3 months, and 37% at 12 months.…”
Section: Improving Filter Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 At the present time, there is no reported consensus to establish routine surveillance guidelines of IVC filters; however, there are guidelines encouraging IVC device retrievals when the duration of treatment for a DVT/PE has been met or when the risk of a PE is no longer high, and/or the contraindication for anticoagulation is no longer a consideration. 7 In this case, the noninvasive renal artery duplex examination played a critical role in her clinical outcome. The use of non-invasive ultrasound for diagnosis of vascular stenoses cannot be underrated as this case clearly demonstrates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%