2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-App Reflection Guidance for Workplace Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where possible, we also will distinguish between educational and workplace learning Fessl et al (2015), because they have different demands with regard to reflection guidance (e.g., known activities vs. unknown activities, time pressure during work).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where possible, we also will distinguish between educational and workplace learning Fessl et al (2015), because they have different demands with regard to reflection guidance (e.g., known activities vs. unknown activities, time pressure during work).…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In "Dimension II: reflection participants: individual vs. collaborative", we will have a closer look at which level reflection is supported. "Dimension III: reflection guidance" looks if and how reflection guidance approaches were applied Fessl et al (2015). In "Dimension IV: success and results of reflection" we will review the success of reflection achieved by different tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the terminology and model can be used as useful language to talk about reflection in the process of designing new, or adapting and adopting existing technology for the purpose of reflective learning. Both terminology and model already form the basis of a significant body of literature that explores computer technology as support for reflective learning in the workplace (such as Balzert et al, 2012;Fessl et al, 2015;Mora et al, 2012;Müller et al, 2015;Pammer et al, 2015;Pitts et al, 2015;Rivera-Pelayo et al, 2013;Sisarica et al, 2013). Furthermore, colleagues of us have created a toolbox that guides the design of technology for reflective learning; this toolbox was positively evaluated with four software development experts (Calori et al, 2014).…”
Section: Designing Socio-technical Systems With the Csrl Model As Bacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the step "referring to experiences" contains referring to experiences in different ways, including providing own experiences and challenging what has been said. Identifying these steps supports the analysis and design of reflection tools, as it allows for an understanding of what is happening in a tool and what needs to be supported to which extent (Prilla and Renner 2014;Fessl et al, 2015;).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the four trials have been reported in previous conference and journal publications [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], but without emphasis on reflection guidance technology. A shorter version of this paper was published at the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning 2015 [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%