2021
DOI: 10.1108/medar-11-2020-1062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In auditor we trust: 44 years of research on the auditor-client relationship and future research directions

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to review the auditor-client relationship (ACR) literature spanning 1976 to 2019 to provide future research directions. Design/methodology/approach The study analysed 140 articles from the Web of Science database, authored by 259 scholars across 28 countries and published in 47 journals. It identified three major research streams to understand the ACR dynamics: auditor tenure, ACR attributes and auditor-client negotiation. Findings Three major findings emerged based on this review. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(160 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adopts a structured literature review applying a hybrid method that combines bibliometric and content analysis techniques (Paul and Criado, 2020; Mustikarini and Adhariani, 2021). The content analysis is a research methodology used to make conclusions from raw data to present knowledge, novel insights, interpretation of facts and a partial guide to action (Mayring, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study adopts a structured literature review applying a hybrid method that combines bibliometric and content analysis techniques (Paul and Criado, 2020; Mustikarini and Adhariani, 2021). The content analysis is a research methodology used to make conclusions from raw data to present knowledge, novel insights, interpretation of facts and a partial guide to action (Mayring, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this paper answers whether and why auditor choice and audit quality vary across life-cycle stages. This interaction has received scant attention in the literature (Habib and Hasan, 2019; Hay, 2015; Mustikarini and Adhariani, 2021). To the best of our knowledge, papers that study audit quality and auditor selection (Jacob et al , 2019) do not use life-cycle stage interaction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, during the audit, familiarity may arise due to the long-term or close relationship between the auditors and the clients. Recent studies discovered that this relationship affects the independence of auditors (Adams et al, 2021;Mustikarini & Adhariani, 2021;Quick & Warming-Rasmussen, 2015;Ye, Carson, & Simnett, 2011). However, there are opposing studies that suggest otherwise (Mautz & Sharaf, 1961).…”
Section: (Ii) Environment Of Audit Companymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, There are many studies on the auditor independence with different approaches in each specific context such as economic approach (Adams, Krishnan, & Krishnan, 2021;DeAngelo, 1981;Geiger, North, & O'Connell, 2005) behavioral approach (Goldman & Barlev, 1974;Mustikarini & Adhariani, 2021) access to risk (Hao, 2021;Johnstone, Warfield, & Sutton, 2001;Turner, Mock, & Srivastava, 2002) framework approach (Bakar, Rahman, & Rashid, 2005;Beattie, Brandt, & Fearnley, 1998;Hoang, Thuong, Minh Duc, & Hoang Yen, 2019;Ndaba, Harber, & Maroun, 2021). However, based on the review results in the research period, there are no studies on the auditor independence from the perspective of international economic integration promote enhancement of auditor independence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%