2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.118275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-depth explorations on the microstructural, thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics of MgCl2-KCl eutectic salt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure and Table S2, the first peak position varies little with temperature, which means the intermolecular distance is insensitive to temperature . The nearest neighbor distances ( d ) of Na–Cl (2.76 Å), K–Cl (3.10 Å) and Mg–Cl (MN: 2.37 Å and MK: 2.34 Å) pairs agree well with FPMD simulations of d Na–Cl = 2.71, d K–Cl = 3.08, and d Mg–Cl = 2.36 Å (MN) and 2.34 Å (MK) at about 870 K as well as d K–Cl = 3.09 Å and d Mg–Cl = 2.34 Å in molten MK at 1000 K, respectively. ,, Besides, the average first peak positions of Mg–Mg and Cl–Cl almost coincide with molten MN ( d Mg–Mg = 3.72 and d Cl–Cl = 3.64 Å) and MK ( d Mg–Mg = 3.74 Å and d Cl–Cl = 3.79 Å), and such small separations between d Mg–Mg and d Cl‑Cl are also observed in pure molten MgCl 2 . From Table S2, all of the d values of listed ionic pairs for molten MN are almost lower than those of MK, resulting in its constricted volume as well as larger density as displayed in Figure b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure and Table S2, the first peak position varies little with temperature, which means the intermolecular distance is insensitive to temperature . The nearest neighbor distances ( d ) of Na–Cl (2.76 Å), K–Cl (3.10 Å) and Mg–Cl (MN: 2.37 Å and MK: 2.34 Å) pairs agree well with FPMD simulations of d Na–Cl = 2.71, d K–Cl = 3.08, and d Mg–Cl = 2.36 Å (MN) and 2.34 Å (MK) at about 870 K as well as d K–Cl = 3.09 Å and d Mg–Cl = 2.34 Å in molten MK at 1000 K, respectively. ,, Besides, the average first peak positions of Mg–Mg and Cl–Cl almost coincide with molten MN ( d Mg–Mg = 3.72 and d Cl–Cl = 3.64 Å) and MK ( d Mg–Mg = 3.74 Å and d Cl–Cl = 3.79 Å), and such small separations between d Mg–Mg and d Cl‑Cl are also observed in pure molten MgCl 2 . From Table S2, all of the d values of listed ionic pairs for molten MN are almost lower than those of MK, resulting in its constricted volume as well as larger density as displayed in Figure b.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In Figure 7, the DPMD simulated enthalpies (H) of molten MN and MK within the NPT ensemble are drawn, where the H linearly increases with temperature, and thus, the c p can be evaluated, according to the derivative of H with respect to temperature. The c p values of 1.193 J g −1 K −1 for MN and 1.284 J g −1 K −1 for MK from DPMD simulations are closer to experimental values of 1.000 J g −1 K −1 for MN and 1.013 J g −1 K −1 for MK 11,54 than previous FPMD results, 35,36 resulting from the realization of orders of magnitude extension in simulation time and size. In addition, the calculated c p for molten MK is higher than that of MN, which is consistent with the higher E bar of PMF for molten MK as discussed above.…”
Section: Dpmd Predictions On Thermalsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations