In Limbo: Seven Families’ Experiences of Encounter with Cancer Care in Norway

Abstract

Introduction: Like many other countries, Norway has seen a shift from inpatient to outpatient cancer care, with pathways aimed at improving the integration and coordination of health services. This study explores the perspectives of seven patients and their family members in light of this change. We focus on one particular phase of the pathway: the first encounter. Our interviews were set in the period from referral until the start of treatment.Methods: Nineteen individual in-depth interviews were conducted in seven families. Seven patients with cancer and 12 family members were interviewed.Results: Three categories of experiences stood out in the empirical material: 'Being in between different health professionals', 'Overwhelmed by written and oral informationʼ and 'Lack of involvement'. Conclusion:This study provides insight into families' experiences with cancer care from referral until the start of treatment. Our findings indicate that families often experience cancer care as fragmented and confusing. Although evaluations have shown that the introduction of cancer pathways seems to have a positive effect on waiting times and standardization of examinations across hospitals and regions, there is still potential for improvement in coordination between services, family involvement, and emotional and practical support. We argue that our findings highlight the tension between two ideals of professional care: standardization and patient-centredness. The study illustrates shortcomings in translating the ideal of patient-centredness into professional practice.

From People-Centred to People-Driven Care: Can Integrated Care Achieve its Promise without it?

“…Our thinking is derived from the Special Collection on People-Driven Care: Co-Designing for Health and Wellbeing with Individuals and Communities that was commissioned to bring together knowledge and evidence of the potential impact of people-driven care, specifically to describe approaches focusing on empowering and engaging people and the role and impact of co-production and co-design. The call for papers yielded 18 papers, of which 14 have to-date been published comprising 8 research papers [ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ], 4 case studies [ 11 12 13 14 ], a perspective paper [ 15 ], and a research protocol paper [ 16 ].…”

“…Hence, rather than having active roles in co-production and co-design, programmes remained for the most part firmly clinically-led and controlled with little ongoing involvement with the subsequent multi-disciplinary teams and services and an ongoing power imbalance in stakeholder experiences [e.g. 8 9 10 15 ]. Such observations have been confirmed in other special issues and previous reviews on people-centred care in practice [ 17 18 ].…”

Lost in the loop - A qualitative study on patient experiences of care in standardized patient pathways

“…Yet the users of health services experience the care as fragmented, and studies show they receive little or no emotional and psychological support and little or no involvement in choice of treatment and care (9,10).…”