2022
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2022-213
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In orbit cross-calibration of millimeter conically scanning spaceborne radars

Abstract: Abstract. The planned and potential introduction in the global satellite observing systems of conically scanning Ka and W band atmospheric radars [e.g. the radars in the Tomorrow.IO constellation, https://www.tomorrow.io/space/, and the Wivern (WInd VElocity Radar Nephoscope) radar, www.wivern.polito.it] calls for the development of methodologies for calibrating and cross-calibrating these systems. Traditional calibration techniques pointing at the sea surface at about 12° incidence angle are in fact unfeasibl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Realistic Doppler velocities that would be observed by WIVERN have been simulated for various reflectivity equivalent noise floors (20, −23, and −26 dBZ) and various integration lengths (1, 2, and 10 km). From the reflectivity and Doppler velocity gradients averaged over 1 × 5 km boxes, NUBF and WS errors corrections (Battaglia et al., 2023) provide unbiased velocity estimates which are compared to the LoS wind velocity, finally yielding the wind residual statistics. Results are similar for forward and side pointing (only the results for forward pointing are shown in Figures 8b and 9 for simplicity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realistic Doppler velocities that would be observed by WIVERN have been simulated for various reflectivity equivalent noise floors (20, −23, and −26 dBZ) and various integration lengths (1, 2, and 10 km). From the reflectivity and Doppler velocity gradients averaged over 1 × 5 km boxes, NUBF and WS errors corrections (Battaglia et al., 2023) provide unbiased velocity estimates which are compared to the LoS wind velocity, finally yielding the wind residual statistics. Results are similar for forward and side pointing (only the results for forward pointing are shown in Figures 8b and 9 for simplicity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Jensen-Shannon distances (like in Battaglia et al, 2023) between ascending and descending pdfs computed in step 3 and for A/D pdfs shifted by different wind biases (e.g. ±2 m s −1 corresponding to azimuth biases of 400 µrad).…”
Section: Cloudsat-based Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Threshold values expressed in terms of integration time or number of measured winds where different bias levels become detectable according to the Jensen-Shannon distances computed in step number 4 (like in Battaglia et al, 2023).…”
Section: Cloudsat-based Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%